Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Juvenile Bale Eagle

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, Washington
    Posts
    134
    Threads
    48
    Thank You Posts

    Default Juvenile Bale Eagle

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    D2xs 80-400mm vr @ 340mm, iso 100, f/7.1 at 1/60 ev0.33, matrix metering, aperature priority, wb cloudy. Bean bag in truck window. processed ACR,cs5, lighten eye area, cloned out branches on left, bottom right and across mid-breast. Comment and suggestions sought. Thanks for looking.
    Craig

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,911
    Threads
    459
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Craig,

    Nice pose and high key image.

    Two things I would suggest

    1. from your settings iso 100, f/7.1 at 1/60 ev0.33 I see you photographed this guy at 1/60 sec.
    I would trade for bit of shutter speed by kicking up the ISO.

    2. Out of focus branches in the foreground. I dont know if you had an opportunity to avoid them or not. I would scout around and find and shooting angle to avoid those two branches.

    -Sid

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, Washington
    Posts
    134
    Threads
    48
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Sid, thanks for the good comments, I shoot a D2xs, and try not to go above iso 320 for noise, I did take images at iso 100, 200, 320, and 400. I started by processing this one beings it was fairly sharp. I took this image at Ridgefield NWR's auto tour, your movements are limited to your vehicle and the road, I can't wait until the walking trail opens so you can work the subject better.
    Thanks again all great things to remember.
    Craig

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas USA
    Posts
    1,819
    Threads
    480
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the detail, though it seems a bit underexposed. I might try some CW rotation to make the bird vertical, it seems to be leaning to the left. Too bad the OOF branches block the view. Have you ever tried pushing the exposure, in other words expose to the right and try to avoid clipping, and then fix the exposure in post processing? There is a big advantage in higher ISOs and I would guess ISO 800 shouldn't be a problem, just as long as you never underexpose the image. regards~Bill

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Los Gatos, CA
    Posts
    551
    Threads
    73
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    wow - impressive detail and sharpness - i struggle to get things sharp at 1/60th without locking down the tripod. Love the ruffled white feathers on his breast and those sharp talons. Do you have the latest version of ACR? The newest version is supposed to deal with noise better than the older ones, I took some pictures of a bird to ID, at a much higher ISO than my d300 handled well, but was able to get quite reasonable pictures with the latest version of Lightroom, and my understanding is that ACR and LR are almost the same code, with different user interfaces.

  6. #6
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    Good points made by everyone, Craig. I think the bird here is beautiful but I agree it feels a little underexposed. The main problem for me is not just that the branches are OOF in the FG but that the branch the bird is standing on feels disconnected from the others because of the angle. If you had even moved a bit more left or right you might have been able to make where the foot is sitting make a little more sense - but then I bet there were more branches in those places or you would have done it, right?

    Good job on the cloning, though. I'm hard pressed to see where you did anything...way to go!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics