Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Late Afternoon Cardinal

  1. #1
    BPN Member jack williamson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    south mississippi
    Posts
    1,979
    Threads
    107
    Thank You Posts

    Default Late Afternoon Cardinal

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Nikon D300, 300 f2.8, 1.4 tc, f7.1, 1/125, iso 400, handheld

    ACR, CS3

    Thanks for your comments.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,588
    Threads
    643
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice soft image of a Cardinal male Jack- and I don't mean unsharp. I think the colours and light combine to give the impression of softness. The BG is beautiful, although maybe softening those up and down lines TR would be useful. The main issue for me with the image is how imbalanced it is with all the action happening LR. To counteract this to some degree, a tighter crop taking off quite a bit from the top and left would work. If you wanted a wall-hanger I would consider a few sticks and generally cleaning up the greenery a bit. I would also sharpen the bird a bit more, only a bit.

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Illinois USA
    Posts
    414
    Threads
    39
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I really like that soft background and the bird looks great.

    Like John, I also find it too low in the frame though.

  4. #4
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    John, what a lovely, soft cardinal image. I also agree that you have way too much negative space in comparison to the bird and that's putting him way too low in the frame. In an typical image such as this, the eye of the bird would be in the UL ROT's area and here it's more centered and down in the lower 1/3 of the image. A good guideline for bird portraits is to let the bird have 50-70% of the frame's space. Of course, there are always exceptions but it works 90% of the time.

    We also like it if you can tell us how much of a crop this is and what all you did to the image in post-processing (levels, curves, saturation, etc.) This helps us make further suggestions so keep that in mind for next time.

  5. #5
    BPN Member jack williamson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    south mississippi
    Posts
    1,979
    Threads
    107
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you all for your comments. Julie I cropped about 10% away from the original, alittle from the bottom

    and a little from the right. The cardinal was a little dark so I added fill light, +45, white balance 5900,

    blacks 5, brightness 50, contrast 54, vibrance -27, all this in acr. In cs3 I cloned out part of the bush just to the

    left of the oof leaf below the bird and then in usm- amount 123%, radius 1.0, threshold 1. I am just learning

    post and the sharpening part is difficult. Thanks.

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Illinois USA
    Posts
    414
    Threads
    39
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I think sharpening for web is a very personal thing. I usually go along the Artie route:

    Select the bird or any other element you want sharpened
    Run USM at 125/0.2/0 - repeat this 3-4 times.
    If the eye still looks as though it needs to be a little sharper I select it alone and sharpen more to taste

  7. #7
    BPN Member jack williamson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    south mississippi
    Posts
    1,979
    Threads
    107
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for the info Ben, repeat 3-4 times, wow, I'll try that.

    Jack

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Illinois USA
    Posts
    414
    Threads
    39
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    By the way Jack, this sharpening is only run after resizing to 1024 wide for posting.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics