Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Sanderling

  1. #1
    Peter Farrell
    Guest

    Default Sanderling

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    (Not 100% sure of my ID)
    Taken yesterday AM along the Chesapeake Bay, First Landing State Park, Virginia Beach, VA. Very cold and windy, partly cloudy, laying down in the sand.
    Sony A700, 70-400G @400mm, f5.6, 1/5000, iso400, -0.7 ec, aperture priority. 70% of FF,
    PP in PSE8, levels, curves, USM.
    Does the line of foam through the birds body hurt the image?

  2. #2
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Peter:

    I like the foam, as it helps establish the environment he lives in, but agree that it would be better if it didn't cut through the body. You probably couldn't go any lower, but that would have helped throw the foam lower in the frame. Or, if you have another frame with good pose where the foam had moved, that might be an option as well.

    I am at work, where my monitor isn't reliable, but the whites on the breast appear a bit hot.

    I like the angle in the frame, pose of feet, sun angle give just a little shading to the rump to round him out a bit.

    Cheers

    Randy

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    New Hope, PA
    Posts
    93
    Threads
    11
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hello Peter,
    I do like the angle that you captured the subject. The foam running through the bird wasn't something that would have bothered me, until you mentioned it. But I really don't find it too distracting and it does help to establish where the bird is. Nice sharp image with good light - a few whites on the breast appear just a tad hot (to me). Very nice!
    Kevin

  4. #4
    Peter Farrell
    Guest

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thank you Randy and Kevin for your comments. I agree that a portion of the whites in the chest look hot.
    Here is a screen shot out of ACR, before any adjustments. Should I have shot with more negative exposure compensation?
    Peter

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    New Hope, PA
    Posts
    93
    Threads
    11
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hello Peter,
    The histogram looks pretty good, so perhaps it's my monitor as well. I usually just hold down the alt/option key while clicking on the exposure triangle (in ACR) to check for hi-lites that need adjustment. If so, then I start with increasing the Recovery a bit.
    Regards,
    Kevin

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Green Lane, PA
    Posts
    744
    Threads
    42
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like it and don't think the whites look too hot, especially for a beach bird. If this was a bird perched in shrubs I'd feel differently. And I wouldn't have even noticed the line if you hadn't pointed it out. It's simply a natural feature to me. Finally, I love that you caught its feet in slick water but the bird is actually surrounded by foam.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Green Lane, PA
    Posts
    744
    Threads
    42
    Thank You Posts

    Default Dunlin, Not Sanderling

    I just realized that I hadn't even looked at the title. The bird is a Dunlin, not a Sanderling. Bill shape and gray head are perfect for Dunlin.

  8. #8
    Peter Farrell
    Guest

    Default

    Paul, Thanks for the comments and the ID.
    Peter

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Taunton MA
    Posts
    1,247
    Threads
    175
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Paul
    You stole my thunder, I looked at the picture and a brownish peep with a black down-turned bill is a Dunlin. I like the capture sharp, and I do not mind the surf in the background

  10. #10
    BPN Viewer Dave Leroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Delta, BC
    Posts
    3,789
    Threads
    380
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Color Cop and the screen capture don't indicate anything blown out. The hottest I could find was high 240's.

    I sometimes check others photos to get an idea for myself and I think some try to keep whites down in 230's or so. Perhaps that is why whites appear bright.

    I had noticed surf line and was going to mention it, but it appears to be a personal thing.

    Nice job on the low angle.

    Dave

  11. #11
    Peter Farrell
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks, Dave. I knew I was below 250 on all the whites but maybe I'll try to get into the 230's next one.
    Peter

  12. #12
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Peter:

    I checked the whites on my calibrated monitor at home, and they look bright, but not blown, so I apologize for the miscall, based on my work monitor.

    I would however consider running a selection on the whitest areas and using the multiply mode try to bring out a bit more of the detail in the breast/flank area.

    Cheers

    Randy

  13. #13
    Peter Farrell
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks Randy. Certainly nothing to apoligize for. I am in agreement with you on the whites. Thanks for the reccomendation on how to bring out the details.
    Peter

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics