another Tern from Doug and Jim's flight workshop (though this one landed on a fence near the spillway to take a break from the feeding frenzy). Guessing from Paul's discussion of beaks that this one might be a Caspian Tern, though this seems shorter rather than more blocklike...
nikon d300, 300mm f/2.8 with tc, 1/2500 sec at f/8 iso 400, 0ev, manual, handheld
cropped and a little recovery done in LR, noise reduction and a little selective sharpening.
I think the whites looked hot after some shadows and highlights, so i darkened the whites just a bit in selective color
I like the composition. Another option may be just a tad off the top.
Whites do not look hot too me but perhaps a bit cool or a bit of blue in them. It may be an idea to try a bit less blue or more red to see how it looks.
Very well done.
Hi Pat. It is likely a Forsters Tern. Could be a common tern, depending on location. I suggest you do as much in the RAW converter as possible. I use ACR, but I assume lightroom is very similar. Exposure/recovery/Curves(Tone Curve) instead of shadow/highlight in PS to adjust lights and darks. The reason why using ACR (or equivalent) instead of PS is because there are far less artifacts, like halos, etc., and everything is easily accessible, Saturation of orange, and luminosity, can be selectively adjusted in ACR by using HSL/Grayscale (the squigly horizontal line icon), and there is a much better, and informative, histogram in ACR. regards~Bill
Last edited by WIlliam Maroldo; 12-04-2010 at 12:32 AM.
Pat, in all your worry to get the whites right (which you did in the OP) you missed that the blacks were blocked. I opened the image in ACR and brought the dark tones up but even with them pushed up the area between his eye and beak is still blocked (you can tell because it has way less detail than the blacks behind his eye near the top of his head.)
I like the recrop suggestion and here is the version where I brought up the blacks. See how much more detail is there now?