Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Sandhill crane blur 2

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer Charles Glatzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    1,690
    Threads
    363
    Thank You Posts

    Default Sandhill crane blur 2

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    This image is copyrighted material as indicated, and is watermarked!

    Sandhill crane blur
    Bosque del Apache, NM

    1D MIV, 600 w/2x, f/11 @ 1/20, ISO 400 ...taken vertical
    Manual, spot off crane, late afternoon
    Post-production- CS5, NIK, Macbook Pro

    See you where there is light, or at the computer

    Chas

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,911
    Threads
    459
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Fantastic image Chas. I like this one better than the previous post.

  3. #3
    Lifetime Member Jay Gould's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In the whole wide world!
    Posts
    2,788
    Threads
    332
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Chas, that is lovely!! Personally, until I can produce consistent tack sharp images, I am not going to venture into blurs.
    Cheers, Jay

    My Digital Art - "Nature Interpreted" - can now be view at http://www.luvntravlnphotography.com

    "Nature Interpreted" - Photography begins with your mind and eyes, and ends with an image representing your vision and your reality of the captured scene; photography exceeds the camera sensor's limitations. Capturing and Processing landscapes and seascapes allows me to express my vision and reality of Nature.

  4. #4
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    this is marvelous stuff Chas! head just the right sharpness to work well...
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  5. #5
    Dan Avelon
    Guest

    Default

    this one is MUCH better than the other one with blurry head. It looks surprisingly grainy for ISO 400, maybe too much sharpening.

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer Charles Glatzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    1,690
    Threads
    363
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Avelon View Post
    this one is MUCH better than the other one with blurry head. It looks surprisingly grainy for ISO 400, maybe too much sharpening.
    Dan,

    Just checked the data, image was taken at ISO 800. Good eye ;)

    Chas

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Sarasota, Florida, United States
    Posts
    3,522
    Threads
    475
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great shot Charles. I need to try this sometimes too.

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    1,320
    Threads
    302
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Count me among those who prefer this one over #1. Though the ideal one would not have the green blobs in the bacground... I know, I know... JR

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    23,119
    Threads
    1,523
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    55

    Default

    Beautiful Chas, I like the sharp head and the delicate look to the wings.:)

  10. #10
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Costa Rica
    Posts
    966
    Threads
    41
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Chas, I wish there was just a bit more room on the left side of the frame, but I commend you for going vertical in the original capture. And I think the light and the mix of sharpness and blur are just outstanding here.

    Cheers,
    Greg Basco

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics