Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Portrait of a Gadwall

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Green Lane, PA
    Posts
    744
    Threads
    42
    Thank You Posts

    Default Portrait of a Gadwall

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Nothing fancy, but I am looking for comments to see if I'm on the right track with my photos and post-processing.

    Nikon D90
    80-400mm f4.5-5.6
    360mm (540mm equivalent)
    f/7.1
    ISO 560
    1/1000
    -0.33 EV

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    sacramento california
    Posts
    500
    Threads
    57
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Good eye contact. good detail Exposure looks good. Would crop a little off the right and add a little room to the left. Might remove one of the catchlights and clean up the water upper left.

    Very good
    Ray

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    1,050
    Threads
    363
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Paul,

    Agree with Ray's comments, in addition I think another round of sharpening would be helpful especially on the head.

    Joel

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,588
    Threads
    643
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Paul- Definitely on the right track. Agree with the comments on composition and sharpening above. I think with some off the right, the left may look OK. A lower camera angle would have been nice but I know it's not always possible.

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    +1 to what Ray said. Like the head angle and exposure.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Green Lane, PA
    Posts
    744
    Threads
    42
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for the feedback. With swimming waterfowl I like to keep the wake behind the bird, but I'm always a bit confused as to how to best present it or if it's even worth presenting.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Green Lane, PA
    Posts
    744
    Threads
    42
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    In tweaking the photo as suggested, I just fixed the second "catchlight". When I blew up the photo, I realized it was actually a tiny water droplet that must have fallen off of his head!

    Thanks again for the help. (You'll be hearing from me again.)

  8. #8
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    Paul, what a lovely image! I know what you mean about keeping the wake in the image with the bird. It can be done but it does usually mean going against the "rules of photography" in order to do it. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. The most successful images I've had with keeping the wake was presenting them with a pano crop - room up front, room behind for the wake and not alot of room top or bottom (usually put the bird about 1/3 from the bottom horizontally and leave 2/3 above him).

    My one issue here is the water...it needs a lot of clean up in order to keep from drawing your viewer's attention away from the bird, the wake and the water in general. We as viewers like to see clean, pristine water most of the time and that means blowing the image up to 100% and going after all the little specs. The great advantage to taking the time to do this is it will make for a cleaner print in the long run.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics