Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: Long-Awaited: 7D, 2X II TC, 70-200 f/2.8 IS L II

  1. #1
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default Long-Awaited: 7D, 2X II TC, 70-200 f/2.8 IS L II

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    This image was created this morning with the new 70-200mm f/2.8L IS lens, the 2X II TC, and the EOS-7D. Evaluative metering +1/3 stop: 1/2000 sec. at f/5.6 set manually. Fill flash at 0.

    I know what I think. What do you think?
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  2. #2
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Unsharpened 100% crop of the image above.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  3. #3
    Ákos Lumnitzer
    Guest

    Default

    I think it's great! Only pixel peepers would complain perhaps. Looks plenty sharp as the optimized web image and decent enough (more than) as the 100% crop. :)

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,911
    Threads
    459
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Sensor overload wiht colors Artie. Awesome. Looks sharp at 100% with 2x

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Illinois USA
    Posts
    414
    Threads
    39
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    As I was one of those who asked, many thanks for doing the test Artie.

    In my opinion this looks pretty good. Of course a certain person from the other thread may turn up and say otherwise (I have yet to see those unsharpened 100% crops that we requested), but this level of sharpness straight out of the camera is very good and is an excellent basis for later processing work.

    Now to decide if and when I cut my three lens bird/wildlife combination (70-200mm f/4, 300mm f/4, 500mm f/4) down to two (70-200mm f/2.8, 500mm f/4). Total weight would be less, quality seems comparable, and economically it breaks about even.

  6. #6
    BPN Member Don Lacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Florida
    Posts
    3,566
    Threads
    348
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The fact that the new 70-200 f/2.8 takes the 2X as well as the current 300 f/2.8 is pretty amazing and makes one wonder how good the new 300 2.8 is going to be.
    Don Lacy
    You don't take a photograph, you make it - Ansel Adams
    There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs - Ansel Adams
    http://www.witnessnature.net/
    https://500px.com/lacy

  7. #7
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The new 300 f/2.8 L IS II will be scary. With Series III TCs will improve AF, it will be insanely sharp, and it will be lighter. Sick. I may even have to try one.... Ooops. I forgot the vastly improved IS system....
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    35
    Threads
    5
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for sharing your impressions about this combo, Artie.

    I am very interested in these results as I currently have the version I 70-200 2.8IS for those times (rare as they are) when I experiment with portrait or amateur sports etc.. And for wildlife I have the 100-400 to compliment my 500. The idea of having 1 less lens in the arsenal is very tempting if I am not giving up any capability.

    To me, the picture above looks very sharp without a doubt.

    One thing I did not see mentioned is the focal length. I assume this was fully zoomed out to 400mm but could you confirm that? Also, have you noticed any difference in IQ when not fully zoomed, any kind of obvious sweet spot when using the 2X?

    Thanks

  9. #9
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Brian, YAW. This one was at 342 mm. Nothing different at 400 to my eyes :) Thus, no sweet spot.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  10. #10
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Kolkata, India
    Posts
    208
    Threads
    22
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The results are indeed impressive here!

    BTW, what do you miss in this setup compared to the 400 DO? The focus hold button and associated perks?

  11. #11
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The only thing that I will miss if I sell the 400 DO is using it with the 1.4X TC.....
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  12. #12
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Blooming Grove, NY
    Posts
    263
    Threads
    17
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Artie,

    Thanks for sharing. I can't wait to try this combination. Just sold my 70-200/2.8 IS and will be upgrading to the 70-200 2.8 IS II soon :)

    I routinely use the 7D + 400/5.6 as my walk-around wildlife setup. It's a lot easier to take on long hikes than the 1D4 + 500/4 or 800/5.6. Up until now I've been keeping the 70-200 in my bag as well, but I think with this setup I could maybe leave the 400/5.6 home.



    thanks
    Charles

  13. #13
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Jamesville, NY
    Posts
    151
    Threads
    11
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I think the picture is very sharp. Even on the nape where the contrast is high one can see the individual feathers. Love the eye contact with the pelican.

  14. #14
    Danny J Brown
    Guest

    Default

    A brilliant shot, Artie. The type of image that inspired me to work harder four years ago and still does today. I don't know how much the 70 - 200 had to do with it, although I have the older 70 - 200/2.8 and love mine, but it is a real beauty, for sure!

    DB

  15. #15
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    118
    Threads
    48
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    What I think is that you're a better photographer than I am. I wish I could manage pictures that good. :-)

    That said, this picture does strike me as inferior to your work with real 400mm lenses, especially at 100%. I guess the question is whether you can swap the 2x fast enough to have a 70-400mm zoom. But my gut says that most nature photographers would be better off with the 100-400mm zoom for this range. Do you find differently? Of course, if the 2X performs equally well on longer lenses, then that's a much more compelling story.

    Personally I wish Canon would put a little more smarts into camera autofocus, especially the 60D/7D lines. If these could autofocus at f/8 (like the center point does on the 1Ds) big teleconverters like this would be a lot more useful.

  16. #16
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Elliotte Rusty Harold View Post
    What I think is that you're a better photographer than I am. I wish I could manage pictures that good. :-)

    That said, this picture does strike me as inferior to your work with real 400mm lenses, especially at 100%. I guess the question is whether you can swap the 2x fast enough to have a 70-400mm zoom. But my gut says that most nature photographers would be better off with the 100-400mm zoom for this range. Do you find differently? Of course, if the 2X performs equally well on longer lenses, then that's a much more compelling story.

    Personally I wish Canon would put a little more smarts into camera autofocus, especially the 60D/7D lines. If these could autofocus at f/8 (like the center point does on the 1Ds) big teleconverters like this would be a lot more useful.
    I just sold my 100-400.... That should pretty much answer all questions. (BTW, I am pretty sure that you have not seen any of 400mm stuff at 100% before so hard for you to compare....)

    When I get home, I am gonna do my first ever test. I am gonna get a resolution chart and compare the 70-200 with the 2X with the 400 DO...

    With birds, keeping the 1.4X or the 2X on the lens depending on the situation should not leave folks holding the bag.... I can, however, see your point while on safari....
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  17. #17
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    118
    Threads
    48
    Thank You Posts

    Default How much difference does the camera body make in these sorts of tests?

    How much, if any, difference does the camera body make in these sorts of tests? The 7D is known for having good autofocus. Could it have an easier time focusing on a teleconverted image than a 50D might? That is, I'm wondering if the difference is not linear. While the 7D will certainly get better results than a 50D on any given lens, I'm wondering if it might get more than proportionally better results on this combo than it would on the same 70-200 sans teleconverter.

    I've been trying out the 70-200 IS II this weekend, and sans teleconverter I'm finding it to be extremely sharp, equal or better than my 400mm f/5.6. (Probably about as sharp but with a higher keeper rate. Thanks IS!) With the 2X Mark II teleconverter though, the difference is not as pronounced and I have to stop down to f/8 to get plausible results.

  18. #18
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Kolkata, India
    Posts
    208
    Threads
    22
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Another question, how is the focus breathing? The Nikon 70 -200 VR II, for example, breaths a lot, so that for closer subjects, focal length is much, much less than 200mm or 400 mm using 2x TC III.

  19. #19
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bay Area, California
    Posts
    142
    Threads
    15
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS II has considerably less breathing than the new Nikon. Like all zoom lenses, there is some breathing but its not big enough to be noticeable unless you are actively looking for it.

    Quote Originally Posted by subhrashis View Post
    Another question, how is the focus breathing? The Nikon 70 -200 VR II, for example, breaths a lot, so that for closer subjects, focal length is much, much less than 200mm or 400 mm using 2x TC III.

  20. #20
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Please explain "focus breathing." I have no clue as to what it means.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  21. #21
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Kolkata, India
    Posts
    208
    Threads
    22
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Artie, according to my rough understanding, focus breathing is a phenomenon where the effective focal length, and hence angle of view of a lens changes while focusing.
    Those looking for a 70-200 + 2x TC route for reach in Nikon-land, may thus have to consider that at closest focus, the effective focal length of 70-200 VR II is around 135 mm (Source: Thom Hogan's review).

  22. #22
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bay Area, California
    Posts
    142
    Threads
    15
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I believe its a term more commonly used by the video folks. Breathing refers to the properly whereby a lens' effective field of view narrows as your decrease the focus distance. For example with the Nikon 70-200 VR II, at 200mm and infinity the lens has an effective field of view of a 192mm lens . However at its minimum focus distance of 1.4m, again at 200mm, it has an effective field of view of a 134mm lens.

    Thom Hogan illustrates the difference well in his review of the Nik 70-200:

    http://www.bythom.com/nikkor-70-200-VR-II-lens.htm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics