Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: IS on or off at high shutter speeds?

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    294
    Threads
    61
    Thank You Posts

    Default IS on or off at high shutter speeds?

    I use a 400mm DO with and without a 1.4x as my prime BIF lens and usually hand-held but sometimes on a monopod. Typically, I shoot at 1/1250 and 1/1600. Although I usually have IS off, I noticed yesterday after returning from a BIF trip that I must have inadvertently set IS on, and when looking at my images on-screen, noticed that some images were degraded somewhat, specifically in areas which are normally sharp. Is it possible that having IS on actually added some movement artifacts?

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I'm not sure if IS degrades image quality, although I tend to doubt it. I'm fairly certain that it slows AF acquisition. I no longer use it for the vast majority of my BIF work, and I find that I get excellent sharpness without it.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    3,949
    Threads
    254
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Chris,

    I have confirmed degradation of image quality with IS on on the 300 f/4 L IS at high shutter speeds, but have tested and not found any degradation on 300 f/2.8 and 500 f/4 L IS lenses. The 300 f/4 is an older generation IS. I would think the 400 DO is a newer generation so should not have the problem.

    Doug, I'm surprised by your statement that having IS on slows AF acquisition. The IS system is independent of the camera (except getting power from the camera. The stabilization should reduce jitter from vibrations that shift the image around that degrade the image, so IS should help AF, even making it more accurate, as long as there is no feedback at high frequency (like in the 300 f/4).

    Roger

  4. #4
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Northern Rockies
    Posts
    1,273
    Threads
    106
    Thank You Posts
    Andrew

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Clark View Post
    Doug, I'm surprised by your statement that having IS on slows AF acquisition. The IS system is independent of the camera (except getting power from the camera.
    What I was trying to say was that I think you can get shots off faster without having to wait for IS to kick in. I misspoke.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    294
    Threads
    61
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you Roger and Doug and Andrew for your advice and suggestions!

    I went out this morning and shot the same subject matter as I did a couple of days ago (bald eagles) but this time with IS off, and it made a marked difference in sharpness so there is definitely some truth to the matter that IS be off shooting at high shutter speeds.

  7. #7
    Johan Kruger
    Guest

    Default

    This is a very interesting conclusion you came to Chris, def going to give it a try

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics