Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Tufted Titmouse

  1. #1
    Brian Kent
    Guest

    Default Tufted Titmouse

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    300mm, 1/350 @ f/5.6 ISO 500
    Having owned my Nikon 300 f/4 for close to a year, I FINALLY set up my Nikon D300S with the 300 to poke just outside my sliding glass door (hidden mostly by curtains) that looks out onto my rear porch where the feeder is. Caught this 'lil guy and thought I had done a decent enough job (in terms of exposure, sharpness and composition) to warrant a post and critique.
    Of note: a portion of my bird feeder was originally in this photo, in the upper right hand corner. I Photoshopped it out (Elements 8), but as you can see by the slightly messy bokeh, I need improvement on removing distracting elements from a photo via PP.
    Sorry the bird is so common - but the pose smacks of attitude and some level of moxy, don't you think?
    :-)
    Thanks!
    Brian
    Last edited by Brian Kent; 10-30-2010 at 12:44 PM.

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,266
    Threads
    3,976
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Brian, this little bird looks great! No need to apologize for it being so common...I'd rather photograph cooperative common beauties like this than chase more uncommon but difficult to properly photograph (e.g. approach) ones. Exposure looks good, as does sharpness (as posted). Although clean-looking and nicely coloured the perch could be better (not man-made)...always fun to pick out nice natural branches and place them close to feeders for the birds to land on for nicer photographs. Tight on the crop, and I do wish the body was better lit - at least the face is nicely splashed by the light, and I like the ruffled chest feathers.

  3. #3
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Brian:

    Sharp, well exposed, perky pose of a nice titmouse with crown fully erect.

    The image needs a bit of CW rotation to level it out. If you have any more canvas on top, I would add back in a bit so his crown isn't so close to the top.
    I think with a little bit more smoothing the cloning job would be fine.

    The 300mm f/4 Nikon is a fine lens if you can get close enough to the birds.

    Cheers

    Randy

    PS: Daniel and I were typing at the same time,sorry for the duplications!

  4. #4
    Brian Kent
    Guest

    Default Here's the original for comparison

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    As you can see, I did a fair amt. of work on this one.

  5. #5
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,266
    Threads
    3,976
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for showing us the original. You did a GREAT job on the bird itself! Perch removal was good too, just a bit of finishing touch needed but you're on the right track there. I see you have plenty of room for a better, looser comp.

  6. #6
    Brian Kent
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Randy/Daniel!!!! Wow, that was quick! Thanks so much for the excellent feedback - I agree, I bit more "breathing room" at the top would improve things, as would leveling out the photo. I'm going to grab some backyard branches and just start pocking them in the feeder so they stick out and provide for a more natural looking perch.
    You folks rock!!!!
    :-)
    Brian

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Posts
    1,353
    Threads
    90
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Agree with the above comments. Might run a round of NR just on the background. You did a good job in bring out details on the white (chest area) too.

  8. #8
    Brian Kent
    Guest

    Default New and improved version!

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Good suggestions all - I cleaned up the bokeh via a bit more NR (Lightroom 3 is wonderful, esp. if you shoot RAW like I do) and straightened out the horizon, so to speak. Couldn't do much about the headroom unless I wanted to start all over again. Still, I think it's a tad improved.
    Thanks again!
    Brian

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics