Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Hairy woodpecker

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    1,065
    Threads
    347
    Thank You Posts

    Default Hairy woodpecker

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    In a local heavily wooded area. The light was poor, I had no tripod with me, and I got this one image by bracing the lens against the nearest tree-trunk before the bird flew off.

    D300, 300 f/4 AF-S + 1.4TC. ISO1000, 1/80, f/6.3. Pattern metering, no flash.

    I blurred the bg using Noise Ninja, added some noise to the black on the bird's back to introduce a little detail, and adjusted the wb. Then sharpened the bird using usm. I hope the blurred branches and light reflections in the bg aren't too distracting. The original was a horizontal image, so I did a vertical crop, but couldn't downsize the bird at all as it was so close.

    Richard

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Chesapeake, Virginia
    Posts
    438
    Threads
    80
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Tough light as you stated and I'm not sure I understand intorducing noise to show some detail in the dark feathers...to me it looks like specks or basically noise. Maybe I'm missing something? I do like the composition and the sft background texture.

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,911
    Threads
    459
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Richard,

    Not sure adding noise will emulate natural details of the bird. Like the composition.

  4. #4
    BPN Member Paul Lagasi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bells Corners, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    5,316
    Threads
    642
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Tough exposure on this bird with all the backlighting, good job on the background, not sure I would have added noise, maybe I'd run despeckle a few times on the back, but thats just me...TFS

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    sacramento california
    Posts
    500
    Threads
    57
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Good composition. Like that you are at near eye level. Detail in breast looks good. I agree w above, don't care for the added noise. Might darken the BG a lillte. fill flash would probably helped

  6. #6
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Relatively sharp with a very nice image design as presented but it looks as if the only thing that adding noise to the black feathers did was introduce tiny green dots, i.e., noise.... Just a bit short on the head angle too.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Shanghai, China
    Posts
    1,076
    Threads
    129
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I congratulate you for having the guts to shoot at ISO 1000 with a D300. I have a D300 and rarely shoot above ISO 800. The speckles on the back of the woodpecker are a real problem. At first I thought they were an unfortunate part of the original shot. Good to hear that you introduced them. I'd like to see this shot cropped a little looser and without the speckles.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics