Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Glacier Bay

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,267
    Threads
    560
    Thank You Posts

    Default Glacier Bay

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Canon 30D
    Canon 100-300mm f/4 @ 100mm
    1/320 sec f/4 ISO 100 HH
    Small crop, S/H, sharpening in CS5

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,829
    Threads
    569
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Ian, interesting image. I had to study it awhile to see the flow and where it dropped. The image emits barrenness and foreboding. The heavy cloud cover on top becomes a nice frame. I also like the fact you have detail in most areas of the image.
    IMO the lit cloud band to the rt of the peak is just a bit bright. If this were mine I might tone it down just a small amount...

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Orford, Quebec
    Posts
    618
    Threads
    129
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great landscape Ian. It must be breath taking to be out there!

    On my monitor, the bottom left of the image seems to lack a little contrast. I agree with Dave's comments.

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,267
    Threads
    560
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks, Dave and Rene. Suggestions appreciated and I will play with them a bit. Yes, breathtaking is an understatement. This image lacks something to give one the perspective of scale -- this is huge. Although my trip through Denali was beautiful sunny weather, my trip through the inland passage was cloudy with some rain. It actually made for some very interesting skies. I would recommend Alaska to anyone.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NE Mississippi
    Posts
    4,700
    Threads
    636
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    That is an interesting image and the overcast sky makes it more foreboding. I like the blue and white tones. I'm sure it doesn't capture the immenseness that seeing it in person does.

  6. #6
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    Ian,

    Though the FG water has some nice patterns in them, the glacier is the center of interest so I feel cropping more from the bottom into a pano will strengthen the viewer's impression of its immensity.

    I agree with Dave on the bright white cloud. Tune it down to maintain the brooding affect you capture so nicely.

  7. #7
    Landscapes Moderator Andrew McLachlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Thornton, Ontario
    Posts
    6,039
    Threads
    480
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Ian,

    Nice capture. I like how you were able to capture this barren landscape. Agree with the comments to crop a bit off the bottom and darken the brightest clouds.

  8. #8
    Roman Kurywczak
    Guest

    Default

    Hey Ian,
    Excellent recommendations above. I have been there a few times myself so I know how it can get! If you had different light.....that ice positively glows!!! I think you did the best you could given the lighting.

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,269
    Threads
    186
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Beautiful landscape. Nice job with the hand holding. I realize using split ND filters on handholds may be difficult but I keep a screw-on split ND for just these situations, it would have really made that sky pop. I really like the lines from the FG across the water which then appears to pull you up through the mountains.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics