Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Feeding Time

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,829
    Threads
    569
    Thank You Posts

    Default Feeding Time

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Shot this at Nickerson Beach earlier this year.
    Nikon D300,500mm,F/8 1/4000,800 iso, -2/3 comp,tripod mtd

  2. #2
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    This is a big needlefish (or ???). Everything is sharp, the light is nice, and the EXP looks right on. Sun angle a good compromise. How could you have improved it 1000%? Flat on the ground = more intimate with all of the sand patterns gone and a soft, sweet BKGR.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  3. #3
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dave:

    Really nice timing, like the action, head angles, exposure, DOF. Contrasty light well handled.

    I really like images that tell a story!

    Cheers

    Randy

    Sorry, I was typing while Artie was posting.

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,829
    Threads
    569
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Artie, agree that lower angles are better. Curious to know in this case if I was lower would the chicks HA be compromised whereby it's eye not be shown or only a part of?

  5. #5
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Mills View Post
    Hi Artie, agree that lower angles are better. Curious to know in this case if I was lower would the chicks HA be compromised whereby it's eye not be shown or only a part of?
    Possibly, but my philosophy is to always set up for the very best image. There is not way that you knew in advance that the bird would angle its head away from you rather than towards :)
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    23
    Threads
    3
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great image great timing with that fish

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics