Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: a different take on seagulls

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer Cheryl Flory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    S.E. Michigan
    Posts
    1,480
    Threads
    218
    Thank You Posts

    Default a different take on Gulls

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    although this photo is not my most eye-catching photo I took today, it made me laugh. I'd love to hear your ideas how to improve these shots, especially how to get more detail in the snow (and feathers if they were open in the picture).
    ISO 200
    1/640
    f14
    290 mm
    exposure correction +1.33

    Thanks!
    Cheryl

  2. #2
    Dave Phillips
    Guest

    Default

    interesting comp Cheryl.
    About detail: light casting shadows is best detail enhancer we have IMO.
    When subjects are backlighted, there are no detail enhancing shadows.
    Get good frontal/slight side light and the detail will be there

  3. #3
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Cheryl Dave is correct This is one that calls for fill flash As is you can play with the mid slicer in levels and will enhance the color of the sand Then you can try the grey on the wings

    A good example of how important it is got nail the image in camera Enhancements can be done but its better to be close

    I love the poses Those laughing gulls are a fun to watch Good looking pair ........ btw there are no seagulls :):cool:

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer Cheryl Flory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    S.E. Michigan
    Posts
    1,480
    Threads
    218
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Ring-billed gulls are not seagulls? didn't know that. I really need to practice my fill flash. I have never gotten it right yet. It sounds like it should be simple, don't know why I can't get it figured out. I was wondering if I used a fill flash if it would make the gulls blend into the snow too much. The fill flash would have also given the spark of light to the eyes too.

  5. #5
    Nonda Surratt
    Guest

    Default

    Cheryl,

    I really, really like the comp and love those red mouths! I know nothing about flash so can't help you there, will say that my gull image was taken in high over cast flat light and I was on the wrong side had the light been good.

    Ring-b gulls are gulls, no seagulls as Alfred said

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer Cheryl Flory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    S.E. Michigan
    Posts
    1,480
    Threads
    218
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    thanks, Nonda. Now I need to figure out how to change the title of this thread.

  7. #7
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Don't worry about the tittle btw I call them seagulls all the time !!!! :)

    ................didn't know they were standing in snow :eek: For the fill flash just set your flash to -1 and blast away The only concern is if you have enough power When the shutter speed goes beyond the sync speed you loose a lot of light

  8. #8
    Gus Cobos
    Guest

    Default Gulls on snow

    Hi Sheryl,
    Love these little guys. Living in New York with the snow for many years, I can safely say that a little bit of fill flash works for compositions like this one. It will bring out the details on the feathers. Like Al says try going -1.0. Experiment with your flash system. Love the composition; practice with your flash...:D

    Gus Cobos...:cool:

  9. #9
    George DeCamp
    Guest

    Default

    I like this image, good interaction. YOu have good advice already about the fill flash. It makes a huge difference!!

    ps: Are these females? :D:D

  10. #10
    BPN Viewer Cheryl Flory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    S.E. Michigan
    Posts
    1,480
    Threads
    218
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks, George. Yes, I need to work on the fill flash.
    females??? why would you ask that??:D
    I don't know, but I didn't see any eye lashes, so I'm going with "nope, not females".

  11. #11
    George DeCamp
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cheryl Flory View Post
    females??? why would you ask that??:D
    I don't know, but I didn't see any eye lashes, so I'm going with "nope, not females".
    hehehe!!! ;)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics