Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Harvestman

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mifflin, TN
    Posts
    2,799
    Threads
    379
    Thank You Posts

    Default Harvestman

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Canon EOS REBEL T1i
    Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro
    Manual mode
    1/640"
    F16
    ISO:200
    LR & CS3
    Tripod
    Canon 430EX w/bounce card: On, Fired

    This 6-legged Harvestman has been hanging around on my moth sheet for 3 days so I decided it must want its picture taken. :)

    Cropped, cloned away some spots of dirt and various debris. Toned down some flash highlights with a soft brush and color selected from nearby areas. Black BG is due to the use of flash and a fast SS.

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Southeast Texas
    Posts
    263
    Threads
    48
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I would be perfectly satisfied with this result.:) I think this is the first look at one of these guys this close that I can remember and I'm awed by the detail you achieved.

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,797
    Threads
    248
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Ken,

    I just keep coming back to this shot.........I would edit my comments as follows:

    Holy "six-legged freaks", Batman......This is way cool! Positioned wonderfully in the frame. The roundness of the beast appearing to suspend from his/her (how do you tell?) legs is so interesting. What a great macro shot. I would consider sacrificing the left furthest leg that crosses the other to get rid of the "x" pattern. Also would have wished for a bit more DOF as I'm wanting to see more detail, but great as is. The black BG pops it "off the planet"!......great job on isolation. Overall, a knockout view into this creature. Two thumbs up!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Way Up! :D

    Sorry for re-editing, just one more thing to consider....the right-most leg is pointing up into the right hand corner of the frame, which tends to draw attention to the frame dimensions, may be a slight reposition in the frame, but leave the body in the ROT position. Small stuff..........:).
    Last edited by Jay Sheinfield; 10-01-2010 at 09:03 AM.

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,829
    Threads
    569
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Ken, fascinating image! I never saw one of these that close up. The lighting and detail are excellent with the black backround popping the subject. The offset positioning in the frame is well handled.
    Since you were using a tripod I might have tried shooting this in F22 or higher if your lense went to F32 to get a bit more depth. I like Jay's idea about eliminating the left furthest leg however you have a winner with this...

  5. #5
    BPN Member Paul Lagasi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bells Corners, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    5,316
    Threads
    642
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Ken..this is a very nice image, the details and sharpness you've gotten on such a small body, unreal....agree about the left leg, but you image your vision..

  6. #6
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Ken. I wish I could see more of its long legs - just kidding!!! This is a very cool perspective - you're getting into MP-E territory with this one. :) I like the suspended globe look as well as all the detail you captured within your DOF. The lighting with the black background is very effective here. Nice off-center comp. I don't mind the legs, as presented, but I'm wondering why we see only two on the right side of the frame - was it missing legs or are they perfectly lined up with the one in front? Very well done.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Solothurn-Switzerland
    Posts
    1,658
    Threads
    127
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Excellent details in this finely exposed image. First time I'm seeing it this close and from the bottom angle.

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer Cheryl Flory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    S.E. Michigan
    Posts
    1,480
    Threads
    218
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    agree with all the above positive comments! especially appreciate the angle!
    what is a "moth sheet"??

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Millington Md.
    Posts
    2,513
    Threads
    365
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Ken....Wonderful shot! Love it as presented! A truly unique image! I am even ok with the dof as everything is sharp that needs to be sharp! :D

  10. #10
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mifflin, TN
    Posts
    2,799
    Threads
    379
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for all the comments!

    Jay, this guy was already missing 2 legs and you want me to crop off another one! :D Actually I see your point so I'll have to give it a try and see what it looks like.
    Dave, my camera loses a lot of sharpness at small apertures. This is a result of trying to squeeze too many pixels into a small sensor so I have to decide whether I want DOF or sharpness, depending on the subject. It's all a balancing act.

    Cheryl, occasionally I'll setup a white sheet at night with black lights shining on it to attract moths. I collect records for my home county to submit to http://www.butterfliesandmoths.org and you must have a definitive photo for a valid record. The pics aren't necessarily good but all I'm trying to do is to get shots that are good enough. Here are some of the shots from this year. http://s128.photobucket.com/albums/p...s/Moths%202010 Moths can be tough to ID so I have lots more shots not on that page. You also gets lots of other night creatures showing up. Last night I had 2 Mantis Flies!

  11. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    1,873
    Threads
    320
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Wow Ken! what a freaky looking creature and a wonderful shot - I've never seen one this close. I like it as is - really pops and the detail is great.

  12. #12
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    Awesome photograph, Ken...really awesome! Love the position in the frame and the detail you got. I can't find anything negative to say...it's just gorgeous. (Did I just say that about a spider image? Nah...) :D

  13. #13
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mifflin, TN
    Posts
    2,799
    Threads
    379
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Julie Kenward View Post
    it's just gorgeous. (Did I just say that about a spider image? Nah...) :D
    It's not a spider so you're safe. You wouldn't want to ruin your reputation! :D

  14. #14
    Roman Kurywczak
    Guest

    Default

    so that's what they look like really close up!!! Very cool Ken and very well done!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics