Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: :Sunny 16 Flower Pots

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Green Valley, AZ
    Posts
    2,323
    Threads
    597
    Thank You Posts

    Default :Sunny 16 Flower Pots

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    First a little explanation of where I live. At 3000' level with the highest amount of sunshine in the US, as well as the healthiest place. We are surrounded by mountains, to the east 2 large mountains over 9000' which makes our sunrises later than normal and sunsets are early because they are blocked by other condos. Another problem is that buildings are white adobe which reflect a lot of light. Last discomfort is the heat, averaging around 100 F at the moment.

    Yesterday for the second day in a row there were no birds at around 2 PM, so this time I chose 2 flower pots on my neighbour's wall. being dark I lowered to speed to 1/80's (After reading Jame's remarks today about adjusting the aperture, I will try that in the future)

    All comments welcome and appreciated.

    What you see is what the camera saw, as the PP in LR3 was very minimal.

    Olympus E-3, Zuiko 50-200, 2.8-3.5 SWD @ 400mm using Gitzo Monopod
    Manual: F/16, 1/80s, ISO 100, 0.00eV, AWB, CWA, sRGB
    Last edited by Gus Hallgren; 09-30-2010 at 01:52 PM. Reason: Spelling as usual

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,588
    Threads
    643
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Sounds like a fabulous place Gus! Beautiful pots! And they look well exposed. I took a look at the histogram and tonal values are spread across the board with a lot at the dark end. The image looks a little under-exposed to me but any more and the highlights in the UR would be blown completely. I did try a little mid-tone adjustment and it brightened things up a bit, but these sort of adjustments defeat the purpose here I think- that is of learning the S16 rule and seeing how well it works out of the camera.
    Last edited by John Chardine; 09-30-2010 at 08:41 PM. Reason: spelling

  3. #3
    Co-Founder James Shadle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Valrico, Fl
    Posts
    5,108
    Threads
    1,419
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    The exposure in the areas that are in full sun and middle toned look pretty dang good.
    Tough to judge the rest because the contrast is so high.

    Just wondering why 1/80 instead of 1/100, I think 1/100 would have been a slightly better choice.
    Do you work in 1/2 or 1/3 stops?

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Green Valley, AZ
    Posts
    2,323
    Threads
    597
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    HI James:

    Thanks for your information. I tried both 1/80th & 1/100, and thought there wasn't too much difference, but will take a closer look at it. My camera will give 1/3 stops. what diference do you think it would make with a calibrated WB? I like this system and also use manual focus. Haven't seen any blinkies with this system. My screen gets calibrated every month & matches perfectly with bottom of page calibration, and I didn't notice a lot of contrast. Do a minimum in PP in LR3, however, I think I will do my nexr Sunny 16 in JPG.

    Appreciate your help

    Gus
    BTW: Need an answer to my Credit Card question.

  5. #5
    Co-Founder James Shadle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Valrico, Fl
    Posts
    5,108
    Threads
    1,419
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Gus said: "do a minimum in PP in LR3"
    That is good when posting images for critique and you want to get them perfect in camera - should be everyone's goal.

    Emailed and CC info.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics