Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Preening Cormi

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,267
    Threads
    560
    Thank You Posts

    Default Preening Cormi

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Canon 7D
    Canon EF400mm f/5.6L
    1/1000 sec f/11 ISO 800 HH

    Crop, S/H, Sharpening in CS5
    NR in Noiseware Pro

  2. #2
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Ian:

    An effective preening pose, well exposed. I like the separation of the feathers in this pose.
    Perhaps a sliver more room at top, although the curved neck/angle reduces the need somewhat.
    Some subtle halos showing along the darker area of the wing/background interface, esp. on the upper medial aspect of his right wing. Pretty minor.

    Cheers

    Randy

  3. #3
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Interesting pose. Way too tight in the frame for me. Good head angle. Light on the very harsh side. Darkening the pupil would make the image look sharper.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,267
    Threads
    560
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks, folks. Artie, what constitutes 'too tight'? I wrestle with that.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,671
    Threads
    140
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Ian. I love the pose but also find the image tight in the frame. I know that you asked Artie but for me when I'm considering "tightness" I ask myself "Would the animal be comfortable in a physical box of this size?" In your example this cormorant would likely "hit its head" on the virtual roof of the frame.

    I'm not sure of my explanation will help but perhaps it might make sense to you.

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,267
    Threads
    560
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Actually, Stephen, that makes perfect sense. I've always tried to give a flying bird room to fly into. I'd never given much consideration to the framing of a stationary bird. I like your approach. Thanks. I'd be interested in hearing from others.

  7. #7
    Ákos Lumnitzer
    Guest

    Default

    I like Stephens crop approach, I never think about it that way, but I would definitely go for a looser framing option. The S/H is very obvious to me here. Nice image and you can definitely do better in more suitable lighting as well. Thanks for sharing. :)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics