Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Black-headed Gull ... back to the drawing board

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    1,065
    Threads
    347
    Thank You Posts

    Default Black-headed Gull ... back to the drawing board

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I recently posted an image of a 1st winter bird in the Avian Critique forum, about which Artie made some interesting comments, and suggested I re-do the whites using his suggestions in the Educational Resources forum. After fiddling about I came to the conclusion that he's right (of course) and that original image isn't really a keeper. So here's another Black-headed gull, this time with a sharper original image, and some adjustments to the white balance, whites, and sharpness, made on the original raw image in LR3 as per the suggestions in the ER forum, and the bg cleaned up in PSE6. I realize the tail is cut off by the sloping foreground.

    D300, 300 f/4 AF-S +1.4TC
    1/2500, f/5.6. ISO640

    Richard

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    1,050
    Threads
    363
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Richard,

    I like the whites on this one, the focus ii sharp, the pose and head angle are good, I would maybe crop a little off the right and add to the left. Also would try to lighten the eye and clone out the green patch just above the birds back.

    I think you did well with the exposure.

    Others might comment on the shoreline intersecting the bird's head but it doesn't bother me.

    Good one!

    Joel

  3. #3
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I like Joel's assessment and suggestions. I noticed that the bird is a bit centered in the frame and you can always add canvas to the left and rework it a bit but doing so in the field would save you the trouble. Try thinking about composition as much as exposure - it's almost as important. ;)

    The only thing I don't like about this image (besides him being so centered) is that his head intersects with the line of the horizon. For that reason, I selected the head/beak area, inversed the selection, grabbed a sample of the rocks/sand in the BG and then painted over the blue area twice with a soft brush set at 25% until it blended with the rest of the BG. Again, watch for this in the field and you won't need to worry about these things. And, as always, this is just a suggestion...do what you feel is best. I just wanted to present you with an alternative.

    And congrats on the exposure!

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    1,065
    Threads
    347
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Julie -

    Excellent lesson on how to improve an image!

    Richard

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member Michael Gerald-Yamasaki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA USA
    Posts
    2,035
    Threads
    311
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Richard,

    Greetings. Detail looks pretty good here, but suffers from the lighting. The top, slightly back lighting, throws a shadow across the breast, the eye, and back. Better light position would have given more detail and perhaps a catch light.

    Jules,

    I like your repost. In addition to solving the intersection, it removes the competing color, leaving the color contrast to the wings.

    Cheers,

    -Michael-

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics