Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Tattered and Torn

  1. #1
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default Tattered and Torn

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    This Common Buckeye has definitely seen better days. How he's managed to continue flying when he's this beat up is beyond me. Lucky for me, he stayed fairly still and let me practice for a good five minutes before he took off again. Not my favorite butterfly image but I do like that he's so wrecked...makes me all the hungrier for autumn to get here!

    Canon 40D, EF 100mm f/2.8 macro
    f4 @ 1/1250, ISO 200
    Pattern metering, handheld, mid-morning sunlight (starting to get harsh)
    Cloned out a few small leaves/flowers and cloned the antenna tip of the right over to the left. ;)

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    1,873
    Threads
    320
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    First, let me say Julie, that I am glad to see you shooting a real live insect. The bug people are rubbing off on you. I really like the tattered look - it tells the story of nature and the progression butterflies go through. I suppose you chose f4 to keep the BG blurred but I think you could have gotten away with it a little narrower and pulled in just a tad more DOF to get the lower left completely sharp (and that antennae too). Did you try other apertures like f8 - f11? A very nice image that tells a story.

  3. #3
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    Allen, the field was so full of plants and flowers that I really didn't think I could get away with anything higher than f4. I did take some others throughout the day at higher apertures and didn't like any of them because the BG's were so prominent. I tend to keep the aperture low and contort my body as much as possible to get me on an even focal plane with the insects - and since I don't "contort" as well as I did in my YOUNGER days ;) I missed that little corner of his wing. (If I remember right, I was about to go sliding down the side of a rather steep ravine so I grabbed the image and moved to the other side of the plant!)

    I'm going out again this morning so we'll see if I can get brave and try a higher aperture again. Thanks for the comment!

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mifflin, TN
    Posts
    2,799
    Threads
    379
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I'm pretty much in agreement with Allen's assessment.

    Jules, as long at the highs stay in the 60's, you should have lots of chances at Buckeyes. This has been a great year for the species and they should get more concentrated when they start migrating south.

  5. #5
    Roman Kurywczak
    Guest

    Default

    Hey Jules,
    Yep.....Allen got my thoughts very well. Keep in mind the distance to the BG plays a huge role on the DOF debate! I actually look for perches where the distance to the BG is the first thing I look for.....more than the subject as in this case.....the tattered look tells a great story!

  6. #6
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jules. Nice image of a geriatric butterfly! You did well at f/4 to get as much DOF as you did. I don't find the DOF falloff to be particularly objectionable here. You might consider adding just a bit more room on the right and toning down the brightest of the whites in the OOF flowers. :)

  7. #7
    Connie Mier
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Julie, would it look too unnatural if you got rid of the white around the head? Only say this because I think it would highlight the butterfly moreso, since its current state of wing disrepair is the main subject. A beautiful example of nature's way.

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Millington Md.
    Posts
    2,513
    Threads
    365
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Julie.....the only thing that bothers me at all is the white near the head of the butterfly. Nice story!

  9. #9
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks everyone - that white at the top is bothering me, too. I probably will evict it. I might even "move" the butterfly to an entirely different flower. Gotta love digital processing!!!

  10. #10
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,015
    Threads
    2,604
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice shot Jules I would have tried f5.6 and i would suggest to clone the left hand flower head, glad to see folks appreciate the beauty of less than pristine subjects.

  11. #11
    Art Kornienko
    Guest

    Default

    Lovely detail and bg. The white of the flower both left and top do seem to distract a touch, like Steve mentions maybe just toning down a bit.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics