Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Spiderwort

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,797
    Threads
    248
    Thank You Posts

    Default Spiderwort

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Just happened by this alluring flowered plant. I couldn't get close enough with a macro, without tramping on ground cover, so I went with a 20mm extension tube and 1.4 t/c on the 200-400mm. Not sure of the proper order, but did camera, then ext tube then t/c then lens..........anyone know if it makes a difference?

    Nikon D3s
    ISO 1600
    550 mm
    exp...1/80 sec @ f/22

    Comments welcome..............

    This one should pass the Stamen police! Although, I just noted two stamen-like plant parts touching........... :)

    Some cropping of grass and plant "things", to get a cleaner image. Nothing major.
    Last edited by Jay Sheinfield; 08-15-2010 at 06:24 PM.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    23,119
    Threads
    1,523
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    55

    Default

    Jay, Mounting the tube on the lens with the TC behind it allows you to focus even closer. When you put the tube on the lens and the TC behind it you lose auto focus so you need to focus manually. I like the colors and the way this pops off the page. I do think the left edge is a bit tight.

    * The normal way to do it is to put the TC on the lens with the tube behind it so you will have auto focus.
    Last edited by denise ippolito; 08-16-2010 at 10:59 AM.

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    1,361
    Threads
    131
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Jay, I really like this image; that 200-400 of yours continues to amaze me. I agree with the previous post; the left edge is a little tight...but it's a relatively minor thing; focus fades a bit on the right as well...you really should give Helicon Focus a try at some point. Was this from yesterday at the Gardens?

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer Dave Leroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Delta, BC
    Posts
    3,789
    Threads
    380
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Well done with the Stamens, as well as the sharpness with all that gear and low ss.

    Flower colours look good with black bg.

    I do notice a few flower outlines in lrc which you may want smudge over a bit.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mifflin, TN
    Posts
    2,799
    Threads
    379
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hey Jay, other than the left edge, this looks pretty good as is but I think it could be even better with a few simple tweaks. I rotated it slightly and gave it some more room on the right, top and left. I selectively sharpened the flower and then selectively sharpened the right petal a bit more. It's definitely not perfect but it's a quick edit to give you some ideas to work with.

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,797
    Threads
    248
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Ken,

    Really like the rotation and added space. What tool/technique did you use for the selective sharpening on leaf. It looks great without adding noise.
    BTW, good work on the stem. Thanks for taking the time. Definitely, up a level or so, IMO.

    Jay

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mifflin, TN
    Posts
    2,799
    Threads
    379
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay Sheinfield View Post
    Hi Ken,

    Really like the rotation and added space. What tool/technique did you use for the selective sharpening on leaf. It looks great without adding noise.
    BTW, good work on the stem. Thanks for taking the time. Definitely, up a level or so, IMO.

    Jay
    I'm glad you like it. :)
    I selected the flower with the Quick Selection Tool and sharpened with Smart Sharpen.

  8. #8
    Roman Kurywczak
    Guest

    Default

    Hey Jay,
    Nice job with the OP......love the comp and colors. I do like Ken's repost and this gives you some great tweak suggestions........this will only make a strong image.....that much stronger....very well done!

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,797
    Threads
    248
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Ken,

    I'm still fairly new to this, so I am asking for your help. I've tried everything with smart sharp and I can't get the results (without significant noise) that you are getting. Would you mind sharing the settings and/or techniques you are using with smart sharp, or point me in a direction
    where I can read up on it?

    Thanks in advance, Jay

  10. #10
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mifflin, TN
    Posts
    2,799
    Threads
    379
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I'm going by memory which can be dangerous sometimes but I think these are the settings I used:
    Basic.
    Amount can be anything from 20% on up, depending on what's needed. Usually 40 to 50% does the trick.
    Radius 1.0 pixels.
    Remove lens blur.
    More accurate selected.

    I rarely used the advanced settings so Shadow and Highlight are at their default settings of fade amount 0, tonal width 50% and a radius of 1 pixel.

  11. #11
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,797
    Threads
    248
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    ken,

    thanks a bunch.

    Cheers, jay

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics