Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Long Billed Dowitcher

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,267
    Threads
    560
    Thank You Posts

    Default Long Billed Dowitcher

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Canon 7D
    Canon EF400mm f/5.6L + Sigma EX 1.4XTC - 560mm
    1/2000 sec f/8 ISO 500 HH

    NR in Noiseware Pro
    Slight Crop, Cloned tip of tail of adjacent bird, S/H, Sharpening in CS5

    Yes, I know, a bit more HA towards me would have been nice but ...
    Last edited by Ian Cassell; 08-02-2010 at 12:42 PM.

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    sacramento california
    Posts
    500
    Threads
    57
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Interesting pose. The HA doesn't bother me. I do find the line/ material running in the water vertically distracting. Might add a bit of contrast to the bird

    TFS
    Ray

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,267
    Threads
    560
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Any better (C-A Fill in CS5)?
    Last edited by Ian Cassell; 08-02-2010 at 03:29 PM.

  4. #4
    Lance Peters
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Ian - the removal of the line in the water has improved - sweet light.
    Doin well - like the pose - HA is a little off as mentioned.
    A little more sharpening perhaps and wonder if the point of focus was on the back - looks sharper than the head/eye area.
    Could have stopped down more - nothing in the BG to be concerned about and had SS to support it.
    Like it!!

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer Mark Young's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sydney - Australia
    Posts
    797
    Threads
    68
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The thing I love about this is not so much the bird, but that you've got a great image of Rhynchokinesis, which is the ability of shorebirds to bend their upper bills.

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,267
    Threads
    560
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Wow. I've never heard of Rhynchokinesis and, in fact, I was worried about my ID because of that curve. Thanks for that little tidbit!

    Lance, you may be right about the focus point. I was using MF because my 400/5.6 won't AF with a TC. I sure miss focusing screens!

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer Mark Young's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sydney - Australia
    Posts
    797
    Threads
    68
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    It usually happens in a split second, and is usually photographed by fluke rather than design. But if you always try and capture the bird when it opens it's bill you will increase your chances of photographing it.

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas USA
    Posts
    1,819
    Threads
    480
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice open bill/ruffled feathers shot. I would hope for a bit more detail though. Why noise reduction at ISO 500, was the image underexposed? Perhaps the tele dropped the IQ somewhat, because the techs (1/2000 sec f/8) seem correct. The mud and other stuff don't add to the image either IMO, so I'd go ahead and eliminate them. regards~Bill

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,829
    Threads
    569
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Ian, I'm very happy to see you shooting under warm light conditions. Improves the image 100%. I like the open bill and as others mentioned wished for a better HA.(not an image killer)
    Agree with Bill regarding the mud. I would eliminate all of it. Keep it up...seeing improvement in quality...

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    2,267
    Threads
    560
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    OK, here it is after removing the mud. Thoughts?

  11. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    9,587
    Threads
    401
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    It's elegant this way, with the clean water. As much as I love warm light, I'd have been tempted to bring the white balance / color temp down a little in the raw converter, for perhaps a bit more color accuracy and bluer water. (But then I'm rarely accused of placing accuracy above art.)

    The camera's decisions about white balance are a good guess, at best. Nothing about it is guaranteed to be "true" to the scene.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics