Results 1 to 28 of 28

Thread: For Artie - Classic Brooks Shot

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default For Artie - Classic Brooks Shot

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I promised Artie that I would post my photo of the bear catching the jumping salmon despite the fact that the HAP are likely to issue a violation. Unfortunately there were not a lot of jumpers and the bear that was catching preferred facing away from the platform. Still here it is:

    Canon 50D
    100-400 @100mm
    1/2500
    f 5.6
    ISO 320
    Aperture Priority
    Not 100% sure but think this was from the tripod. Cropped to remove extra space to the left.

    C&C welcome and appreciated. Thanks,

    Rachel

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,596
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Well captured Rachel and what wonderful sighting

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auranagabad ( MS ) India
    Posts
    12,833
    Threads
    766
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    well seen and captured Rachel , I liked the wider perspective
    TFS

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer Steve Canuel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,444
    Threads
    444
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Rachel,
    I like the crystal like look of the water cascading over the falls. Lack of eye contact here doesn't bother me as the bear is doing something and is pointing in toward the center of the frame where you'd expect the fish to jump.

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Hilary, Harshad and Steve for the kind comments. Glad you like it.

    Rachel

  6. #6
    Lifetime Member David Israel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Southern IL
    Posts
    31
    Threads
    2
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Rachel, as you can see from my posts I'm a new guy.

    I like the timing of this shot, that the bear's jaws are still wide open and that you can still see virtually the entire salmon. The picture allows our minds to move forward in time to the inevitable snap of the jaws, making it feel even more dynamic.

    You did a terrific job on the exposure, given the dark upper water juxtaposed to the white froth at the bottom of the falls. Also, although reduced in size it still appears that you have yourself a nice sharp copy of the the 100-400, wide open.

    The composition works for me... only wish that the bear had cooperated a bit more and made eye contact with the lens; though I suppose that I could say that I wish the fish had cooperated a bit more to allow the bear to make eye contact with the lens! :)

    I am curious about the bear's right shoulder: is that a scar, tag, etc?

    Wonderful image, Rachel. Capturing an image like this is definitely on my bucket list. Just don't know if I can pursuade my wife to get this close to something farther up the food chain than a defenseless photographer (the only thing that we shoot with is a camera).

    I would also love to know where this was shot at.

    Thanks,

    Dave

  7. #7
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Sweet image and love it as presented !!! Get a Big Congrats here Rachel !!!!

    One thing I can not understand is why anyone would like to have the bear looking at the camera? Making eye contact with the lens would ruin the image... seems like he would be missing the fish, the animal is engaged in a behavior and would look unnatural any other way !!! Remember a similar comment in avian, had to do with a flicker battling for his life with a starling and someone suggested it was better if it had eye contact ... I guess that is why we have choices !!! Just my opinion !!!!

    Hi David do appreciate you jumping in and giving your opinion, always good to do so, we like different points of view and looking forward to many more !!!

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,596
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Al, couldn't agree more but I have seen time and time again here in Wildlife the comment made about eye contact. Perhaps having some eye visible is nice, but having eye contact probably says more about our human need to connect than it does about photographing wildlife in their natural environment.

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auranagabad ( MS ) India
    Posts
    12,833
    Threads
    766
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alfred Forns View Post

    One thing I can not understand is why anyone would like to have the bear looking at the camera? Making eye contact with the lens would ruin the image...

    What a relief , excellent comment Alfred , gives me courage to post more behavior shots now

  10. #10
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Dave and Al for the kind comments. Just want to clarify that I was not hoping for eye contact just slightly better positioned head. Although this is almost full profile, the bear's head is just a few degrees tilted to the opposite side of the river.

    Dave - welcome to BPN. You'll be able to learn a lot in a short amount of time if that's your goal. This was taken at Brooks Falls in Katmai National Park, Alaska. Tell your wife that most of the bear viewing there is from platforms, though you do have a short hike to get to the platform. The bears also freely wander through the lodge area but the rangers are great about preventing any issues.

    Thanks again,
    Rachel

  11. #11
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Harshad and Hilary posted their responses while I was composing mine. Hopefully, my clarification about not wanting eye contact but just a slightly better head position puts everyone at ease. I am very happy with this image.

    Thanks again,
    Rachel

  12. #12
    Ken Watkins
    Guest

    Default

    Ineresting comments on this image.

    Firstly the wide open view adds greatly, many people would go for the head shot.

    This is an "action" shot and to my mind the HA is largely irrelevant, although of course it would not be good if the bear were staring at the BG.

    IMHO there should be no rules in action images, just good images showing behaviour at it's best, which this is.:D

    That said I am wondering if this needs a little more "vibrance"

  13. #13
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Sorry, forgot to answer Dave about the bear's right front shoulder. It is definitely not a tag (didn't see any while at Brooks and don't think they tag or collar the bears there). I believe it is either a scar or bald patch where there may have been a recent wound.

    Rachel

  14. #14
    Lifetime Member David Israel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Southern IL
    Posts
    31
    Threads
    2
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Rachel, thank you for the update. Seems the bear had a spot that was bare! :) Thank you too for the location information. Such information is always of interest to me when considering future places that my wife and I could visit, and it is appreciated.

    I read Alfred's comment with great interest and will answer his question in a private message, so as not to detract from this excellent post. I should point out for clarification that "eye contact" was not the best choice of words, as I meant to imply seeing one or both of the bear's eyes in the image and not necessarily having the bear looking directly into the lens. However, even under those circumstances Alfred's question is still valid. What I will say here is that I gave a great deal of thought to Alfred's question and the mental exercise led to something of an epiphany. It allowed me to look at your image from an entirely different perspective that would have been unlikely for me to have done before, given my own personal experience, taste and expectations. It was a revelatory moment that I will thank Alfred for, later.

    As Alfred stated, the images "as is" is terrific! :)


    Dave

  15. #15
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,551
    Threads
    1,285
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Rachel, all said above. Colour looks pretty spot on and natural. Great setting.

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  16. #16
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Eagle River Valley, Alaska
    Posts
    1,371
    Threads
    64
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nicely framed classic Brooks image, and I agree that the bear is looking where the bear should be looking. One salmon, one bear, nice habitat. Well done.

  17. #17
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Ken, Dave, Steve and John - Thank you all for your comments. Ken - I purposely wanted the wider shot to show the falls and the behavior. IMHO the head shot without the context just isn't the same. Once again, thanks to all for the kind comments.

    Rachel

  18. #18
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Rocky Mountains
    Posts
    761
    Threads
    49
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great shot Rachel, I just got back from Alaska and Brooks Falls this morning - a wonderful trip. It rained almost the whole time I was in Katmai (just a day and a half), almost no sun. However, still wonderful. The shot is wonderful and well done, especially since you were a bit early for the real salmon run, it still hadn't hit when I was there on July 19,20th and so not a lot of salmon, yet. I also experienced the fish all seemed to jump to the bears' left and so the head was turned the same direction for almost all the chances I got for that classic shot, which were somewhat limited. Darn nature doesn't always cooperate like we would like, does it? I have enjoyed your shots from this trip.

  19. #19
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Tom. I look forward to seeing some of your shots. Were they still saying that this was a particularly low salmon run? When I was there the news was reporting that it might be a 30 year low.

  20. #20
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Rocky Mountains
    Posts
    761
    Threads
    49
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Rachel, I did not hear it was a 30 year low, but everyone talked about it being light and very late, not usual by any stretch. I still loved it there and wished for more sun and more time there, one night was not enough but all they had available when I got the booking. Originally, months ago they had no openings, after retrying for months, we got in for the one night.

  21. #21
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Rachel, this is one sighting that I would still like to experience. Great timing, and I feel you have placed the bear very well in the frame. I really like all the rushing water.

  22. #22
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Stuart

  23. #23
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thanks to Rachel for posting this. Rache, I gotta say that you get around!

    Well, first I will critique the image and then, in the next pane, I will likely spoil everyone's party (without mentioning any names or quoting anyone) :) Exposure for the water looks fine. The color of the bear's fur looks a bit muddy as if it had been underexposed in the original and then lightened in Photoshop. A longer focal length would have been ideal here as the large rock in the upper right is not a plus. As presented, I would suggest a crop as in the repost leaving just the corner of the rock and taking some off the bottom.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  24. #24
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Yes it would be stupid if the bear's head were square to the back of the camera here while the salmon was jumping past it to the left of its head. And yes, Rachel made the best possible image herewith the equipment she had and pushed the shutter button at just the right time. But the image simply is not a contest winner or even a good contest entry. Why? Because the bear's head cannot be seen clearly.It is turned away. Yes, the head angle is a poor one for this image. (Do note that eye contact has zero to do with it and has never had anything to do with a proper head angle. (See my recent comments in the Head Angle Philosophies thread in the ER here.)

    For those who are aghast at my position I ask only that they look at Tom Manglesen's classic Brook's Falls image, "Catch of the Day." Before you post stating that everyone above is right and I am wrong--oh, how I love when that happens--look at Mangelsen's image and ask yourself, "Which has a better head position?" Case closed.

    Respectfully.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  25. #25
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Artie for the comments. I like the repost. The color issue may be due to a s/h adjustment. I totally agree with you regarding the HA. I always said that I wish the HA was turned toward me a few degrees or at least parallel rather than a few degrees toward the other side of the river. While I am happy with the shot for all the reasons everyone notes, I am not thrilled with it. Still a keeper though and might even make my wall.

    Again thanks to all for their comments and viewpoints.

    Rachel

  26. #26
    BPN Member Stephen Earle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    A, A
    Posts
    597
    Threads
    158
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    First of all, congrats on a fine image. The timing is excellent and the composition is fine as is in my view.

    I agree however on the colour of the bear here as it does look a bit unnatural. It seems, on my monitor, that there is a slight halo around the bear (noticable underneath the tail). Could this be due to selecting the bear and then running a s/h adjustment?

    As to the strength of the image I agree with Artie. A question I always ask myself is : "If I had to paint or draw this scene would I have done it with this way?".

    In this instance, I'm sure you'll agree, if you had to draw it, you would have included a better head angle.

  27. #27
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Stephan. No selective s/h and I'm pretty sure that's not a halo (it's that way in the RAW file) but the bear's tail just happens to coincide with the start of the rushing water. Thanks again,

    Rachel

  28. #28
    BPN Member Stephen Earle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    A, A
    Posts
    597
    Threads
    158
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for clearing that up Rachel.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics