Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Rose-breasted Grosbeak

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    1,065
    Threads
    347
    Thank You Posts

    Default Rose-breasted Grosbeak

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    A lovely and fairly common bird here in Summer, with a lovely song. Approx. 15% crop, some sharpening, curves, oof branches in bg removed.

    Camera Model: NIKON D70s
    Lens: 300.0 mm f/4.0 +1.4TC hand-held
    Focus Distance: 5.62m
    Aperture: f/7.1
    Exposure Time: 0.0025 s (1/400)
    ISO equiv: 800
    Exposure Bias: none
    Metering Mode: Matrix
    Exposure: aperture priority (semi-auto)
    White Balance: Auto
    Light Source: Unknown
    Flash Fired: No
    Color Space: sRGB

    Thanks for looking.

    Richard

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Spring Hill, Florida
    Posts
    662
    Threads
    160
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Bird is sharp and has nice colors but the background is a bit too bright for my tastes and distracts my attention from the bird

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Taunton MA
    Posts
    1,247
    Threads
    175
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I would darken the background and remove the extra catch lights in the eye otherwise 4 plus image

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,173
    Threads
    219
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Good advice above, although I would leave the catchlight since it is a reflection of the sky. The blacks look pretty noisy: you might try backing off on sharpening a little.

    Looking forward to more!!

  5. #5
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Richard:

    Colorful fellow in nice condition. Sharp.
    Based on the amount of noise in the blacks, I would guess that you significantly underexposed the bird, and then had to increase the exposure in post to compensate, and this brought up the noise.
    He probably would have benefitted from +1 or so +EC. The background would have gone pretty bright, but that is probably easier to deal with in post then the noise induced.
    Just something to consider next time you are in this shooting situation.

    Cheers

    Randy

  6. #6
    Susan Candelario
    Guest

    Default

    He is one beautiful bird. Good comments already noted above.

  7. #7
    Lifetime Member James Salywoda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    H. Bch. California
    Posts
    2,860
    Threads
    315
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Beautiful bird and bg it suffers from a bit to much noise.

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    36
    Threads
    6
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Agree with comments above. I would try to give the bird a little more space to the right. One of my tendencies is to get too tight on the subject.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics