Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Tufted Titmouse

  1. #1
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default Tufted Titmouse

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    D90; 80-400 VR @ 370mm. ISO 1000. f/5.6, 1/200s. -0.3 EV. Shutter priority. Tripod. Built-in flash @ 1/4 strength.

    Taken near mid-day in heavy shade, near my water bubbler. I haven't had much experience using flash, and find my flash shots often look very flat. Experimented with lots of settings, and this one seemed to turn out best (luckily also coincided with the best pose). Not sure the settings make much sense; I need to get a proper flash. C&C appreciated.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Millington Md.
    Posts
    2,513
    Threads
    365
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Bill...I don't shoot much flash but this looks good to me! Nice sharpness overall...eye seems just a bit soft....with nice feather detail. The bg was handled well!

  3. #3
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Miller View Post
    Hi Bill...I don't shoot much flash but this looks good to me! Nice sharpness overall...eye seems just a bit soft....with nice feather detail. The bg was handled well!
    Thanks Bob. Agree the eye (and head in general) are a bit soft. Focus point was on the shoulder, which might have been ok if I had shot at f/7.1 which I usually do with this lens, but using shutter priority to keep the 1/200 max sync speed, 5.6 is where it ended up. Maybe should try manual. Not as many options with the in-camera flash as there would be with a Nikon speedlight.

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,829
    Threads
    569
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Bill, Agree about the softness but good backround with the flash giving the subject even lighting. I'm noticing a magenta cast in the image.

  5. #5
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Bill. Lots of good things with this image !! From the tech side I like the settings particularly using shutter priority to stay within the sync speed of the flash ... And btw don't think it had an effect?

    Like the pose an exposure, lots of detail at both ends Agree with comments

  6. #6
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Dave and Al. As to the magenta cast, now that you mention it I see it too. In Raw Capture the image looked too blue to me "As Shot", so I warmed it up just slightly. Probably should have left well enough alone.

  7. #7
    Lance Peters
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Bill - agree with the comments above - Also cant really see any effect from the flash - maybe at full strength.
    You will get much better results with a off camera flash.
    Keep em coming. :)

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    8,458
    Threads
    682
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice pose Bill. Techs covered. Like the simple BG too.

  9. #9
    Glenda Simmons
    Guest

    Default

    One of my favorite yardbirds. I like your pose showing it running it's mouth! so typical for this bird :p

  10. #10
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thank you all. I've reposted here with a green filter on the bird at 20% opacity to try and reduce the magenta cast (might have gone a bit more?), and tried to sharpen up the head without adding noise. (Also added some texture to the top of the twig.) As to the flash, if you could look at some of the images taken that same time without flash (which I have unfortunately deleted) you could see that the flash did make a small but perceptible difference. My goal in using flash was to add a bit of brightness in the heavy shade, without looking like a flash shot. If you can't see any effect, maybe I achieved it???;)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics