Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Smaller Pixels vs Bigger Pixels and Camera Shake

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,042
    Threads
    100
    Thank You Posts

    Default Smaller Pixels vs Bigger Pixels and Camera Shake

    Hi there,
    I have seen two seemingly authoritative camera websites allude to the fact that some of the latest DSLRs with very small individual pixel sizes need to be shot at higher shutter speeds than those cameras which have bigger individual pixels. This is because the small pixel sensors are more sensitive to recording camera shake. I have also asked a techie friend of mine who confirmed this with a formula, which I don't have handy and I didn't follow it:). However, I have also had several other photographers question this and express their disbelief.
    After doing lots of shooting with Canon's 7D it seemed to me that whenever I was handholding anything from 300mm upwards I had a better success rate with much faster shutter speeds that what I was used to using with 30Ds and 40Ds on the same lenses.
    Thanks for reading, I would just like to hear some expert opinions on the topic.
    Grant

  2. #2
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas.
    Posts
    6,260
    Threads
    426
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Grant, you are right....better to have higher SS with smaller pixels. Read Roger's comments on the following thread. He makes excellent points in there. as usual.

    http://www.birdphotographers.net/for...-shutter-speed

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Barnstaple,South West England
    Posts
    155
    Threads
    28
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    From what I have read the problem occurs because with smaller pixel sizes you will be more vulnerable to 'pixel bleed'. I read a Canon white paper some time ago which basically said that with more pixels on the same size sensor you need more support (or faster shutter speed I guess) especially for long lenses.

  4. #4
    Emil Martinec
    Guest

    Default

    Smaller pixels have more resolution, and so more capability to resolve any flaws in image capture. If you are not cropping the image more with the higher pixel count camera, however, it will not be "more susceptible" to motion blur. The motion blur is a property of the image presented to the sensor; it does not become stronger just because you recorded the image more accurately. Note also that with the greater image information provided by the extra pixels, you stand a better chance of being able to mitigate the blur using eg the motion deblur in Smart Sharpen or in the Focus Magic plugin in Photoshop.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,042
    Threads
    100
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks very much for the responses guys, much appreciated.
    cheers
    Grant

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Grant, nice thread this could be noteworthy for the Ed Educational Forum as well.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics