Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Irish Colourful Bird !

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Wicklow, Ireland
    Posts
    184
    Threads
    39
    Thank You Posts

    Default Irish Colourful Bird !

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Well not just an Irish Bird. This is a Blue Tit (Titmouse to give it its full title). Taken in my back garden (also know as yard for the people in the colonies :D). The garden is quite dark and because it was in Ireland there was very little light but I thought this turned out quite nice. About a 30% crop.

    Let me know what you think

    Michael

    D40, 500mm, 1/100 @ f7.1, EV -1 1/3, ISO 640, Metering:Pattern

  2. #2
    Lance Peters
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Michael - gorgeous bird - exposure looks good and sharp were it needs to be.
    Like the colours - Good HA and nice clear sharp eye.
    As presented I might crop some more from the top - a little too much negative space up there for my tastes.
    (Id crop about 1/3 off)

    Also it would get rid of some of the Cloning artefacts that are up there.

    Looking forward to seeing more :)

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Sarasota, Florida, United States
    Posts
    3,522
    Threads
    475
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    That is what my eyes are drawn to, then cloning job in the BG.
    When you clone like this, I after you are done, I would drop the opacity a bit until it looks normal.
    I wonder what you did you use for cloning.

  4. #4
    Ricardo Rodriguez
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Michael, I've found out the hard way that cloning requires a lot of care and attention to detail. I do like the BG, but would crop as suggested by Lance. Also, my eyes keep coming back to the branch, may consider darkening it a bit. Lovely bird.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Wicklow, Ireland
    Posts
    184
    Threads
    39
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I must have been asleep when I did the cloning - I'll try again and crop as suggested and repost.

    Thanks

    Michael

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,829
    Threads
    569
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Michael,Good advice above and agree with the crop suggestion.
    A good way to spot cloning artifacts is to put a black backround around the image in PS. This has a tendancy to enhance the spotting of any mistakes...

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    1,225
    Threads
    14
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Often, a good way to find cloning mistakes is to open a levels adjustment layer (or curves or hue/sat ...),
    close it without making any adjustment, and change the blend mode to screen.

    In addition to the cloning problem, there's slight blue cast ...


  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    8,458
    Threads
    682
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Repost took out the blue cast. Agree with a crop from the top, but wonderful image that just needs a few tweaks.

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Wicklow, Ireland
    Posts
    184
    Threads
    39
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thanks again for all the comments and suggestions. I have redone the image and here is the result - very close to Davids's post.

    Thanks again for all the help

    Michael

  10. #10
    BPN Viewer Mark Young's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sydney - Australia
    Posts
    797
    Threads
    68
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The repost is a very nice improvement over the OP. It's a very beautiful bird indeed. Judging by your shot details this was taken in poor light? If so opening the apeture right up to get a faster SS would give you just a bit more detail.

  11. #11
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Another fine thread with lots of useful information !!!! Last re post working fine, just needs more room !!!

  12. #12
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brussels, Belgium
    Posts
    1,106
    Threads
    116
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Young View Post
    The repost is a very nice improvement over the OP. It's a very beautiful bird indeed. Judging by your shot details this was taken in poor light? If so opening the apeture right up to get a faster SS would give you just a bit more detail.
    Are you sure about this, Mark? This is a very small bird and I think most of the "detail" is already pretty much there. I think that opening up is going to reduce the depth of field and put more of the bird out of focus. It is a pretty low shutter speed, I agree, but I think he got away with it this time! ;)

    Repost looks good, albeit a bit tight at the top for my taste.

    Gerald

  13. #13
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    1,225
    Threads
    14
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Just for the record, I cropped my repost only to isolate the areas where the blue cast was most noticeable. I wasn't suggesting a crop. :o (Though I would take some off the top.)

  14. #14
    BPN Viewer Mark Young's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sydney - Australia
    Posts
    797
    Threads
    68
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gerald Kelberg View Post
    Are you sure about this, Mark? This is a very small bird and I think most of the "detail" is already pretty much there. I think that opening up is going to reduce the depth of field and put more of the bird out of focus. It is a pretty low shutter speed, I agree, but I think he got away with it this time! ;)

    Repost looks good, albeit a bit tight at the top for my taste.

    Gerald
    My train of thought was a faster SS would give him a bit more detail in the bird, but you're right, it would do so at the expense of reducing the depth of field which may make the back half of the bird more out of focus.
    I can't help myself, I'm on a never ending quest for more detail!! :D

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics