Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Another Swallow-tailed Gull

  1. #1
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default Another Swallow-tailed Gull

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    D90; 80-400 VR @ 122mm. ISO 400. f/7.1. 1/2500s. -0.3 EV. HH. Almost full frame.

    I overlooked this one when first processing my Galapagos images last month -- it was underexposed and didn't look like much in the RAW file. I added +1 exposure comp in RAW conversion (should have been positive in the first place), and did some minor levels and s/h tweaking. I think lightening it up in conversion added some noise in the underwing, but I was afraid to use NR on the bird. Rotated CCW slightly and trimmed; otherwise full frame. C&C appreciated.

  2. #2
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Bill with the new programs like Noiseware Pro or LR 3.0 you don't have to worry much about detail in the bird, they both (and others) do a good job of reducing noise and protecting detail !!

    Opening one does create problems, always check histogram !!! Love the sharp eye, wing position and bg clouds !! .. does have a slight blue cast !

  3. #3
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alfred Forns View Post
    Hi Bill with the new programs like Noiseware Pro or LR 3.0 you don't have to worry much about detail in the bird, they both (and others) do a good job of reducing noise and protecting detail !!

    Opening one does create problems, always check histogram !!! Love the sharp eye, wing position and bg clouds !! .. does have a slight blue cast !
    Thanks Al. I've been using Topaz Denoise 4.0, which also seems to do a pretty good job if I adjust the 'preserve detail' slider to compensate for the degree of NR. I don't know if the others do any better. (Tried LR 3.0 in Beta and it seemed slow each time it loaded, so I let the free trial lapse.) I'll try Topaz here on the underwings. I think at least some of the blue may be the sky through the translucent wings, and/or reflection of the ocean. White portions of the clouds seem pretty white to me, and if I use the bird's eye to set the black point, it doesn't seem to alter the blueness; but I could be wrong.
    Last edited by Bill Dix; 06-19-2010 at 02:33 PM.

  4. #4
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    All good reasoning Bill !!! btw the Topaz is a good program, does well with detail !! Its good to test so you know what to expect !!

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auranagabad ( MS ) India
    Posts
    12,833
    Threads
    766
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    sharp eye, wing position , bg clouds and excellent advise
    TFS

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas USA
    Posts
    1,819
    Threads
    480
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice composition and lighting. I have several NR programs, and although I have Topaz DeNoise 4, I really didn't appreciate it till I actually read the instructional PDF . Fancy that, reading the instructions helps! Much better than noise Ninja, and makes more sense in the controls. regards~Bill

  7. #7
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the angle and wingspread Bill, and just love those clouds in the sky BG. I do detect the blue cast too.

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,269
    Threads
    186
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I agree with Stuart, I love the wing spread and the cloudy sky makes this very nice.

  9. #9
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WIlliam Maroldo View Post
    Nice composition and lighting. I have several NR programs, and although I have Topaz DeNoise 4, I really didn't appreciate it till I actually read the instructional PDF . Fancy that, reading the instructions helps! Much better than noise Ninja, and makes more sense in the controls. regards~Bill
    Thanks Bill. I guess I should try reading the instructions.

  10. #10
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thank you all for the comments. I have run a moderate pass of NR, added an orange filter (#85) at 10% to try and remove the blue cast, and knocked down the highlights in the clouds a bit. Any better?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics