Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: American Goldfinch

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Gronlid, Saskatchewan
    Posts
    68
    Threads
    27
    Thank You Posts

    Default American Goldfinch

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Taken yesterday in my new feeding station with permanent blind in my backyard. Please critique away. I am especially interested whether the colours come across as too saturated or contrasty. I know his beak should be cleaner, but that's what you get at a feeding station.
    Canon 7D, 500mm f/4L with 1.4 TC
    1000/s at 5.6 with +2/3 (which I seem to need with just about all shots on the 7D)
    ISO 400
    some cropping ca. 20%
    darkened with curves (dark -25) and -.20 exposure in LR3
    Clarity +29
    vibrancy +10

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    1,050
    Threads
    363
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hello Thomas,

    Nice close shot and nice background. I think you could desat. the yellows and maybe bring out more plumage details, also anoher round of sharpening could be applied. You may also get critique about the lack of detail in the blacks on this one. You might be able to remedy it with exposure, contrast and level adjustments.

    Joel

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,829
    Threads
    569
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Thomas, Good remarks by Joel!
    Nice pose,HA and well placed within the frame.
    Agree about lack of detail in the yellows and more in the blacks. I see some in the blacks some I'm sure they can be brought up.Exposure looks good on the whites in the tail area.
    Overall a pleasing image!

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    1,225
    Threads
    14
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The red channel is pretty blown; that's why the details got lost. If you shot raw, it might be fixable.

  5. #5
    Lance Peters
    Guest

    Default

    HI Thomas - agree with the guys - red channel is toast -going to have to go back to the raw for this one.
    You do shoot in Raw - Right!!

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Gronlid, Saskatchewan
    Posts
    68
    Threads
    27
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thank you all for your comments. Sorry for responding so late but it took me some time to figure things out.
    Indeed, I hadn't noticed that the red channel was blown. In LR the histogramme gave no indication of that but PS sure showed it clearly. I will have to check this in PS in the future when I have doubts.
    Your comments also sharpened my view for colour with which I have had a struggle.
    I tried the method for restoring clipped channels from the luminous landscape website, which seemed very complicated and I didn't understand a thing. Then I noticed the tutorial from David (Thanks!) on hot yellows here in the educational resources. After a number of attempts (I am not very knowlageable of PS) I came up with this version, which is better concerning saturation and detail in the yellows. However I feel that the colours I percieve in real life are more brilliant than this, but maybe that's just me.
    Any further comments more than welcome.
    Thomas

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics