Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: night outing with new lens

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Posts
    1,353
    Threads
    90
    Thank You Posts

    Default night outing with new lens



    D700
    300mm f/2.8 VR II with Nikon TC-20E III
    600mm
    ISO 800
    f/7.1 at 1/500s
    Manual mode
    Matrix Metering
    Auto white balance
    struggling with tripod :p

    100% crop to 1024x800 pixels, SOC

    Finally pull the trigger on the new lens, didn't really get a chance to try it out until at night. So point at the moon and shoot. Did try handheld too, VR seems alright :)

    All comments and suggestions are welcome.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Posts
    1,353
    Threads
    90
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Repost with curve, sharpen and NR.


  3. #3
    PeterCollins
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Mate,

    I been playing with the moon myself as well,

    Seems a little hot for my tastes, here is what i would have done.

    You may like it you may not :) if not just tell me to sssshhh and i will go hide :p

    Otherwise its a great image, i love moon shooting :D


  4. #4
    Ricardo Rodriguez
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Thanaboon, my first impression on your initial post was good, but after a few seconds something didn't seem right. Then I saw your repost and really love it. Peter's version has a shining, silvery look to it: also excellent. Now I'm jealous; need to get a shot like that someday soon!!!!!

    Ricardo

  5. #5
    Vilma Rodriguez
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Thanaboon, I like your repost.

    Vilma

  6. #6
    BPN Member Julie Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    1,236
    Threads
    122
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanaboon, your repost is much better. It really brings out the features. I also like Peter's version for the same reason that Ricardo mentioned.

    I've got to tell you that when I saw your first post and read that you used a 300 f2.8 with a 2X TC, I went right out into the back yard and shot the full moon. It just happens that this week I rented a 400mm f2.8L IS lens. I noticed the full moon tonight, but it didn't dawn on me to take advantage of the lens this way until I saw your post. I also used a 2X TC, so I got 800mm. :cool: Thanks so much for the inspiration!:D
    My photoblog: juliebrown.aminus3.com

    My galleries: julielbrown.smugmug.com

    My WordPress blog: indybirdphotographer.com


    "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks”.

    John Muir

  7. #7
    BPN Member Kerry Perkins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Simi Valley, California
    Posts
    8,310
    Threads
    1,048
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanaboon, nice job on the repost and congrats on the new glass. Peter, your repost looks a tad over-sharpened to me. Curious what others may think, as sharpening is about the toughest thing for me to get right...
    "It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera... they are made with the eye, heart, and head." - Henri Cartier Bresson

    Please visit me on the web at http://kerryperkinsphotography.com


  8. #8
    Lifetime Member Michael Gerald-Yamasaki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA USA
    Posts
    2,035
    Threads
    311
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kerry Perkins View Post
    Thanaboon, nice job on the repost and congrats on the new glass. Peter, your repost looks a tad over-sharpened to me. Curious what others may think, as sharpening is about the toughest thing for me to get right...
    Kerry, it looks to me that Peter's repost either is over-sharpened or over-contrasted (too sharp a curve). The repost has also picked up a fair amount of jpeg artifacts and contrasted-sharpened them into view (horizontal lines). It is hard to get good results sharpening (or adjusting contrast) working with what amounts to mono-chrome in 8-bits (what jpeg is) because there are only 256 gray scale levels.

    Cheers,

    -Michael-

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Posts
    1,353
    Threads
    90
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Gerald-Yamasaki View Post
    Kerry, it looks to me that Peter's repost either is over-sharpened or over-contrasted (too sharp a curve). The repost has also picked up a fair amount of jpeg artifacts and contrasted-sharpened them into view (horizontal lines). It is hard to get good results sharpening (or adjusting contrast) working with what amounts to mono-chrome in 8-bits (what jpeg is) because there are only 256 gray scale levels.

    Cheers,

    -Michael-
    Yes, I did try a quick PP after posting with RAW file and the result came out with much less artifacts. Another advantage of shooting RAW I guess.

    This one with RAW then to jpeg, toning down the lower right part a big.
    Last edited by Thanaboon Jearkjirm; 04-28-2010 at 10:34 AM.

  10. #10
    Lifetime Member Michael Gerald-Yamasaki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Santa Cruz, CA USA
    Posts
    2,035
    Threads
    311
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thanaboon Jearkjirm View Post
    Yes, I did try a quick PP after posting with RAW file and the result came out with much less artifacts. Another advantage of shooting RAW I guess.
    Thanaboon,

    Greetings. I wanted to say that the image has great detail (the 300VR + TC20EIII is just the combo I'm wanting, so your post is most interesting to me) looking at it in detail in PS.

    Presenting the detail in all it's glory is challenging. As I said above, jpegs in 8 bits only have 256 grayscale levels. That means the SOC shot contains all the detail in perhaps only 70-80 levels for this shot (about in rgb 170,170,170 and up). If you need perhaps 10 levels to show a nice sharp edge... you can see the problem...

    Definitely, something to work on from a 14-bit raw and 16 bit tiff.

    Also, a little less exposure would help. This is a case similar to getting white feather detail... shifting exposure a little to the left helps with the detail.

    Congrats on the lens acquisition!

    Cheers,

    -Michael-

  11. #11
    PeterCollins
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Guys

    yeah its not easy doing mods on a jpg from the web :p

    Just how i would have looked at it, i think thats what i love about Moon photos so many different ways to PP them! :D:D:D

  12. #12
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Love moon shots, a good tripod will make an average lens look good. In this case after repost, makes a great lens and 2x look really nice.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics