Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Woody Woodpecker

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,588
    Threads
    643
    Thank You Posts

    Default Woody Woodpecker

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Captured this image of a male Pileated Woodpecker today near Pocologan, New Brunswick. It gave it's characteristic call as it sat on the dead Elm tree. He must be starting to think about breeding.

    40D, 100-400mm @ 400mm. 1/2000s, F6.3, ISO 640. DFine noise reduction. 25% crop.

  2. #2
    Maxis Gamez
    Guest

    Default

    Hi John,

    The dry trees in the top left are some what distracting. The composition does not work for me as the bird is looking to a "wall" if you will. I would also add more sharpening to bring more details out!

    Keep them coming.

  3. #3
    Fabs Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Hi JOhn, nce high key background. Wish the bird had a little more detail in the plumage. The OOF branches don't bother me.

  4. #4
    BPN Member Don Lacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Florida
    Posts
    3,566
    Threads
    348
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I am also fine with OOF branches, but have to agree with more detail and sharpening of the Pileated, still better then any thing I have of this species.
    Don Lacy
    You don't take a photograph, you make it - Ansel Adams
    There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs - Ansel Adams
    http://www.witnessnature.net/
    https://500px.com/lacy

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,588
    Threads
    643
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Many thanks for all the comments. I've attempted a bit more sharpening and cropped a bit.

    I am fighting the pretty heavy crop to begin with. As someone mentioned the other day, the 100-400 works well at about 25 feet or less range. This makes sense for the average size of objects we photograph. I was a lot further away from the Pileated than that. I find I am pushing the distance and cropping envelope these days because we are still in the midst of winter and the bird pickings are pretty slim. If I had the 500F4 (dream!), doing this would not have so many consequences.

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Cleveland
    Posts
    470
    Threads
    17
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Woody Woodpecker actually was a redheaded woodpecker.

  7. #7
    Steve Foss
    Guest

    Default

    John, I like the shot.

    You might go back to the original crop and use shadows/highlights in photoshop to bring out feather detail in the blacks. A lot of noise reduction softwares seem to turn things waxy or make them look painted on, and that might be costing you detail in the blacks, too.

    Woody the Woodpecker was not modeled after the red-headed woodpecker (Melanerpes erythrocephalus), but after either the pileated (Dryocopus pileatus) or the ivory-billed (Campephilus principalis). There is some debate on which of the latter two inspired Woody, but most sources attribute his inspiration to the pileated.

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,588
    Threads
    643
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Steve. You are right about the noise reduction. I'll go back to the original raw and see what's there. Thanks also for the confirmation of the species that Woody Woodpecker was modeled after. I didn't rally think too much about this when I typed in the subject line to the original post.

  9. #9
    Steve Foss
    Guest

    Default

    John, it may be a six-of-one, half-dozen-of-the-other situation with shadows/highlights. The more detail you bring up in the shadows, the more you see noise and the more you want to eliminate it. If your NR program has iso profiles for your camera, that's good. I use noise ninja and download all the iso profiles for the camera bodies I've used so I can have the program run a better profile without a lot more work.

    Also, I'm pretty big on selective sharpening. Particularly when the bird's body is dark and the head is light to medium tone, I'll lasso the head and sharpen it without sharpening the body. Then I may even lasso the eye and give it another bump in sharpening, depending on how it looks. The head is generally the focal point of any viewer, with the eye being the spot on the spot of viewer focus.
    Last edited by Steve Foss; 02-27-2008 at 07:02 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics