Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Tamron 70-300 Di LD vs. Sigma 70-300 DG macro

  1. #1
    Bob Ferry
    Guest

    Default Tamron 70-300 Di LD vs. Sigma 70-300 DG macro

    I am in the process of adding in a moderate size telephoto to my lens selection. In the latest issue of OP magazine there is a section dedicated to Tele-Zooms. Both of the above are listed. Each one had decent reviews by those using them. James Shadle has recommended the Tamron while Carol Polich has recommended the Sigma. I am looking for other opinions. I have worked with James before and trust his recommendation and am leaning toward the Tamron based on that. I do not know Carol nor have I used the Sigma lens before so Im looking for other feedback.
    I am looking for something lightweight, great glass etc. I hope one day hope to get published in something other then small time periodicals etc so Im looking for something that I will give me that kind of quality.
    Opinions are most appreciated. Thanks to James Caldwell for directing me to this website.

    Regards
    Bob F.

  2. #2
    Blake Shadle
    Guest

    Default

    Hi, Bob. What camera system are you using? If it's Nikon, you can get a great price on the Nikon 70-300VR f/4.5-5.6 G-AFS ED-IF... It's a very sharp piece of glass, and you can't beat VR at this lens' current price.

  3. #3
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Bob another advantage to the suggestion by Blake is re-sale price At some point you will sell it and the difference is significant

  4. #4
    Bob Ferry
    Guest

    Default

    Blake,
    I am using the D80 and if anything else I will be getting another Nikon Body. Im very happy with the camera so far. Have my eye on the D300 now. I agree resale is a consideration and appreciate the advice. I swear when James lent me his 80-400 I was a believer. The 600 wasnt bad either just a bit outta the price range for us working folks. :-)
    Bob

  5. #5
    Blake Shadle
    Guest

    Default

    The 80-400VR is a good lens. The AF is slow and it's not internal focus (the front element moves when focusing), but I've made many of my favorite images with it. It can be extremely sharp, when used with good technique.

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,099
    Threads
    166
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Bob
    I have the Tamron70-300 but could just as easily have gone for the Sigma APO.
    If I were to start again I would like to compare the 2 lenses for the focussing speed of each as I sometimes am a bit dissapointed in focussing speed for BIF pictures.
    There again it might be camera related.

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cary, North Carolina
    Posts
    789
    Threads
    64
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blake Shadle View Post
    Hi, Bob. What camera system are you using? If it's Nikon, you can get a great price on the Nikon 70-300VR f/4.5-5.6 G-AFS ED-IF... It's a very sharp piece of glass, and you can't beat VR at this lens' current price.
    Blake,
    Wouldn't your dad be pushing the Tamron? That was the impression I got from the new Outdoor Photographer :)

  8. #8
    Blake Shadle
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by David Kennedy View Post
    Blake,
    Wouldn't your dad be pushing the Tamron? That was the impression I got from the new Outdoor Photographer :)
    He is :D Bob asked if there were any other comparable lenses in the price range. We own the Tamron 70-300, Nikon 70-300VR, Tamron 180 f/3.5, Tamron 200-500 f/4.5-6.3 (more on the way)... So majority rules ;)

  9. #9
    Bob Ferry
    Guest

    Default

    Guys,
    So let me ask a follow-up question. Which of the three top lenses quoted here would give me the best value for the money, quickest focus and sharpest image?. I have 500.00 to spend on this lens and want to get one that I am gonna be able to use for many years to come. I have used a Nikon VR lens and was happy with the photos I took. I have not used either the Tamron nor Sigma. The Nikon VR of course runs close to 2x what the others seem to be running which is not a great deal IF the other priorities are met.
    Blake, I take it your dad got rid of the 80-400???


    Thanks in advance
    Bob

  10. #10
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Orlando, Florida
    Posts
    993
    Threads
    166
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I highly recommend the Nikon 70-300VR. I have not used the others, but for quality and handholdablity the Nikon I would not be without! Examples below







  11. #11
    Blake Shadle
    Guest

    Default

    Here's another image made with the Nikon 70-300VR (you may have seen this one ;))



    For the money, I don't think you can beat the Nikon 70-300VR. It has to be one of the most affordable image stabilization lenses on the market, and I'm convinced it has great image quality.

  12. #12
    Bob Ferry
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks everyone. I guess thats the one I will pick up then.

    Bob

  13. #13
    Bob Ferry
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nancy A Elwood View Post
    I highly recommend the Nikon 70-300VR. I have not used the others, but for quality and handholdablity the Nikon I would not be without! Examples below







    I Love the 2nd picture!!! Awesome IMO

    Bob

  14. #14
    Bob Ferry
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Ferry View Post
    I Love the 2nd picture!!! Awesome IMO

    Bob
    Blake,
    wasnt that photo taken when we were at Flamingo in the Glades????

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics