Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Killdeer portrait

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Costa Mesa, CA
    Posts
    1,289
    Threads
    445
    Thank You Posts

    Default Killdeer portrait

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    D70s 70-200VR+2X@360 1/800 f/5.6 ISO400 0EV Handheld

    This morning I found this guy hopping along the beach, alone. The image is Cropped, with NR and Sharpening applied. A very small area of the whites is still a bit hot. By the way, I had never before noticed the small, distinctly black (untouched in PP) "toenails".

    Wendell

  2. #2
    Lance Peters
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Wendell - some of the whites are on the edge - might try to recover via a linear burn/multiply layer.
    BG is not all that flattering - so might consider cropping some from the top.
    Good HA and eye contact.
    Looking forward to seeing more :)

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    North Carolina's Crystal Coast
    Posts
    382
    Threads
    84
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Wendell. There's some nice detail to be found in this shot. As Lance said, the whites are on the edge. A light application of "Shadows/Highlights" might bring out some more detail in the whites...or try the methods Lance suggested. Other than the whites the biggest thing I notice is the angle of view. It looks as if you're towering over the bird. Kneeling or even bellying-down might've produced a nicer POV. I'm learning/noticing that the difference between a good image and a great one is often a matter of whether the photographer got down to eye level with the subject before pressing the shutter release. Sharp eye, good detail in the middle-grey areas of the body, a nice catch light.. plenty to like here.

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    wendell, shadow could indicate high contrast light. Agree with comments above, both Lance and Bob nailed the opportunities to improve. I really agree with the lower perspective. IMO, when we shot birds at their eye level we can see their world as they do. It make a huge difference in the composition - when we can take a lower position.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,829
    Threads
    569
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Wendall, Agree with above comments. One way to tell the approximate time of day an image was taken is the length of the shadow a subject gives off. Looks like a long shadow here so early light was still apparant.
    I see you shot this without any exposure comp. Might be good to check this periodically as the light changes...

  6. #6
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Wendell I'm sure you can recoup the whites with suggestions !!! Worth since the bird look good !!

    ... now what do you mean you hadn't noticed the black toenails before :D:) ..don't have full frame foot shots of that bird !!!:eek::cool:

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Costa Mesa, CA
    Posts
    1,289
    Threads
    445
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks to all . . . !!!
    Lance -- the crop does make it look better.
    Bob -- S/H worked . . . I was on my knees but was on a path high above the bird, and could not have got lower.
    Jeff -- Yes, the light was "contrasty". It was early and in what passes for winter sun in SOCAL.
    Dave -- The image was taken at 7:36AM. And you are right, I should have dialed in some minus EV.
    Alfred -- Though old in years, I'm very young to bird photography and still working on an extensive collection of full-frame lores and testes images :o;):D

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics