Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Graylag Portrait

  1. #1
    Nonda Surratt
    Guest

    Default Graylag Portrait

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Haven't been holding up my end on this forum, hope to get back with it soon!

    This image was made at a park that has very human friendly waterfowl, a first for me. I attempted to get low (on the ground) for some water images and almost got trampled:D

    MIII, 300f2.8+1.4 tc @f5.0, ISO 400, 1/2000

  2. #2
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Nonda these guys can be dangerous !!!!!!! Sure is keeping an eye on you !!!

    I like your exposure clean bg and sharp focus My suggestion would be trying to get closer to the bird so you don't need the converter At the shorter focal length you can get away with a little less shutter speed stopping down more and having more dof (less focal length) The eye looks sharp but there is no crisp detail around it I know what that camera is capable to do

    Also a little work around the eye to make slightly lighter then saturate would make it look even better !!! btw I used that combo 2.8 with Mk3 at Newfoundland last summer and gave outstanding results Even the AF speed was good with a 2X !!!

  3. #3
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    I like the composition and BG is appealing. He is certainly giving you the once over!

    Alfred has some great suggestions.

  4. #4
    Nonda Surratt
    Guest

    Default

    :D. You are absolutely right about the 1.4 Alfred I sure didn't need it! Not something that happens around here often at all. I was doing some serious backing up while still trying to make some images, bit un-nerved by the whole thing. My 200f2.8 would have been perfect.

    Could you give me a quick visual on what you mean about the eye?

  5. #5
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Nonda never owned a 300 2.8 I'm sure Robert can tell you better but there should be some dof loss with the increase focal length Quality wise there should be very little difference

    The 200 2.8 would be perfect and fun I do a lot of these guys and just try to get the perfect image .... keep going back:cool:

  6. #6
    Nonda Surratt
    Guest

    Default

    Alfred I mean the post work you would do on the eye. Pretty please if you have the time.

    On the DOF part of it ' I think' is using the same DOF I used with the 30D, what seemed to work fine with the 1.6 crop body isn't enough with the 1.3?? Maybe?

  7. #7
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Here it is Nonda I selected the eye and lighten some then saturated Then selected the pupil and darkened more In this case is not dramatic but does look a little better I think is all just little changes here and there

  8. #8
    Nonda Surratt
    Guest

    Default

    Its the little things that make a difference..THANKS Alfred, I need visuals sometimes.

  9. #9
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    On some it makes a huge difference Will try to find one an post !!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics