Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Black-Capped Chickadee

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer Jeff Sorbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Stittsville, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    256
    Threads
    75
    Thank You Posts

    Default Black-Capped Chickadee

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    A700+Sigma 120-400mm, 230mm, 1/1500, f/5.6, ISO 640, LR Adjustments & Cropped

    Fletcher Wildlife Garden, Ottawa, Ontario.

  2. #2
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Loverly COMP and I like the setting. The head is slightly turned away, the bird's feathers seem to be lacking fine detail, and the BKGR is way-noisy.

    Thanks a ton BTW for your membership support.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  3. #3
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Jeff:

    Artie hit the main points. The image does seem pretty noisy in the background. I am not familiar enough with this camera to know if this is typical for this ISO, or if it was aggravated in post, by having to bring up the exposure, or some other adjustments.

    The bird itself is well exposed, and I too like the comp. I might consider very lightly toning down the brightness of some of the background areas, so they don't compete so much with the bird. Won't take much to get a better balance of subject/background.

    Cheers

    Randy

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer Jeff Sorbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Stittsville, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    256
    Threads
    75
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Artie & Randy.I will start passing these htrough a noise reduction cycle. I have one question...How do I get more detail in the feather?. I have yet to master Manual Mode shooting and I wonder if that would help...shooting @ f/9 or f/11 in Manual Mode and selecting the fastest Shutter Speed possible? I shoot handheld also so maybe its not using a tripod that is causing the lack of detail??? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

  5. #5
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Jeff:

    Certainly, a tripod can be a big help for more detail when pushing the exposure envelope. It becomes much less critical if you have enough light. But, it helps in other ways, such as composition, helping you frame the image more accurately.

    Each lens has a sweet spot, and in general, a zoom may need to be shot at a smaller aperture for maximum image quality. I don't know the optical performance of your Sigma, but the Nikon 80-400 for example, is sharpest in the f/7.1 to f/8 range. Obviously, lots of other factors to consider, but the tripod will give you more flexibility on your exposure settings.

    Shooting manual by itself won't make the pictures any sharper, but it will allow you more options on how you balance shutter speed vs. aperture vs. ISO. If the lighting is consistent (not ducking in or out of clouds, or going from full sun to shadows, manual is the way to go. If the bird is in consistent light, it won't matter what the background changes to, your bird exposure will be accurate (assuming it set the exposure right in the first place, of course.) I will take a couple of test shots, check my exposure on histogram, fine tweak my manual camera settings as needed, and then don't have to worry about the background changes, etc.

    Too aggressive noise reduction will eat up fine detail, so try to do selective noise reduction on the background, usually most needed in darker areas.

    Lots of variables, but for most of us, the cameras and lenses are better than we are, we just need to work to their strengths.
    Cheers

    Randy

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer Jeff Sorbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Stittsville, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    256
    Threads
    75
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Randy

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics