Hudsonian Godwit

[Doug Rodda]

600mm MKII
ISO 400 5.6 @ 1/640th
Taken in CT just before the first hard freeze this past November, lens foot on the ground.

[Jory Griesman]

I like the mood of this image. Well exposed, sharp and good comp (I might take a tad off the top, though), and action (snail or worm). Good low angle position. Nice background. I'm not sure if it would result in any improvement, but I'd be curious to see what the image would look like if marginally lighter (curves or levels).

[Tony Whitehead]

Great capture with the prey - I like the BG. Wonder if a marginally higher viewpoint would have reduced the OOF foreground a little without threatening the BG. Some additional sharpening would optimise for web presentation and some NR on the BG would also be worth adding. Agree a slightly brighter version would be worth exploring.

[Mike Milicia]

Agree with all above, especially regarding the lovely background!

Maybe a bit more room at the bottom for the virtual feet.

[allanrube]

I actually would take off just a tiny bit of the oof foreground. Agree that it needs to be lightened or perhaps shadows/highlight.
Great capture; you caught the instant perfectly plus you have the head at a good angle.

[Matthew Studebaker]

I like the shooting angle - great pose. I agree a bit lighter (brighter) would be nice. also the head looks like it has motion blurr (slight).

[Arthur Morris]

Count me with Tony and a slightly higher perspective. Love the open bill with prey item. Note the single first winter feather coming in.

[Doug Rodda]

So this is a first year bird? Explains why it was stone dead tame!

[Arthur Morris]

The fringed feathers, the consistent even patterning, and the warm buff tones on the breast are diagnostic of juveniles.

[niranjan sant]

lovely low angle,nice soft light and the open bill with food makes this image