Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Wanna know what I think of the Homer City Council?

  1. #1
    Dick Ginkowski
    Guest

    Default Wanna know what I think of the Homer City Council?


    I am suffering from Homer withdrawal.
    Canon EOS 20D 500mm 1/200 sec f/10
    Last edited by Dick Ginkowski; 02-10-2010 at 07:03 PM.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    313
    Threads
    58
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice and close!
    great detail and colour, my only wish would be to have seen all of the birds white head feathers, the last bit on the right is clipped.

  3. #3
    Lifetime Member Marina Scarr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Posts
    10,347
    Threads
    403
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dick: Your SOH is refreshing, and I love the look on this eagle. Agree with Paul on wishing for more bird on the right. That said, I feel for you and the bird!

  4. #4
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    What a look! - and a fine image. I agree that just a little more room on the right would make it even stronger.

  5. #5
    Dick Ginkowski
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks, folks, for the feedback.

    I want to respond about the compositional choice here. I had a tough call to make. I needed to be tight in order to convey the soul of the image but I had to leave a little room at the left. On the right side, I made shots with a bit more to the right but they came at the expense of less room at the left or less tight which diluted the power of the image. In motion picture photography and photojournalism head shots aren't always perfectly balanced. You often see a tight shot for effect. Here, the choice was to include a little more on the right at the expense of the left or giving up some of the power of the image. The "deleted data" if you will really wasn't critical to the success of the message of the image; in fact, it could have detracted from it. Did I really lose anything essential? I don't think so.

    My point isn't to exchange nits but rather to say that technical perfection according to "the rules" may not necessarily result in a better image, or at least one that's more powerful.

    It's kind of like the two casts of the revival of South Pacific. The lead actress on Broadway has an exceptional voice as an opera singer and nails every note plus her performance is quite good. The lead actress in the touring company has a great voice, nails every note but, as a Texas girl, identifies more with Ensign Nellie from Little Rock and it shows. She may be a hair less technically perfect than her Broadway counterpart but the soul that she brings to the role blows the doors off. Sorry to ramble but I actually did play with different compositions and the suggested crop just wasn't as powerful.

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,439
    Threads
    47
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Dick, I am little late to the party but I thought I would share my thoughts. I personally like your presentation. The centering of the birds face as it is looking down the barrel of the lens creates a dynamic presentation. I do appreciate the others comments as it gives me something to think about ponder that I may not have considered. Composition in my opinion is heavily dependent on personal choice/preference. Yes there are "rules" of composition but I think of them more as guidelines. In the end your the artist and it is your creation. If your image pleases you is what is important. Thanks for sharing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics