Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Moutain bluebird

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    sacramento california
    Posts
    500
    Threads
    57
    Thank You Posts

    Default Moutain bluebird

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Nion d200 600 mm TC 1.4
    Tripod
    F 5.6 1/1600
    0 EV Meter matrix ISO 400
    Early afternoon light

    My critique: Perch ugly but there were no trees
    Background too monchromatic Maybe should have used smaller apeture then maybe more character in the BG

    Digital workflow question. To post for the web I reduce the image size in steps per previous suggestion made here, ie. 3000 to 2000 to 1000 using bicubic sharper setting, but it appears to me that causes the image to look oversharpened.

    Suggestions welcome
    Thanks for looking
    Ray:)

  2. #2
    Lance Peters
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Ray - agree about the perch but no control over that.
    Contrasting colours tend to work well together,colours that are next to each other on the colour wheel maybe not so well, many strive to get a nice clean one colour background like you have here.
    Like the eye contact, a little too centred for my personal tastes if you have more space all around a different crop maybe along the lines of the rule of thirds might help.
    Exposure and details look good.

    Generally I use save for web and devices in photoshop - optimised to a file size of 200k - Made a action and just run that when I want to post a image.

    Looking forward to seeing more :)

  3. #3
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Ray. Good bird. Exposure looks good as does HA. Agree with Lance about a bit more room all around. Sharpening has been my nemesis; but I've had better luck once I started to use Lance's suggestion of 'save for web' optimized for 200k. I keep a Master File of the large unsharpened TIFF, convert it to jpeg as above (sometimes having to reduce file size in stages first), and only then do I sharpen the smaller file while monitoring the effects at 100% image size. I still don't get perfect results and others will have different work flows, but this has been starting to work for me.

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    1,881
    Threads
    192
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    A very pretty Bluebird, Ray and while the bg is uniform, that's lots better than one with lots of twigs, limbs, etc. My workflow is like Lance and Bill's except that I've never reduced the size in stages; just go right down to 1000 or 800 for vertical.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Looks like some selective sharpening might help - on-balance nice mage. Might move it off-center some.

    I reduce file size as noted by Katie, then save as noted by Lance. Then sharpen the sized image, zoom to view for cloning and other errors too. I agree with Bill as well regarding the TIFF image to save a master file.

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    sacramento california
    Posts
    500
    Threads
    57
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks to everyone for the comments and suggestions.
    I will try to recrop. I am slowly understanding the rule of thirds. I have read the section in Art's book at least 3-4 times.

    Ray;)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics