Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Snowy Egret

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Costa Mesa, CA
    Posts
    1,289
    Threads
    445
    Thank You Posts

    Default Snowy Egret

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    D70s 70-200VR+2X@310 1/800 f/5.6 ISO400 -2/3EV handheld

    Early this morning the sun was behind the clouds and there was a slight breeze -- and it was cold! This bird was one of four foraging in the mud flats at low tide. I cropped, adjusted and sharpened the image minimally in LR. One goal was to eliminate the white "blinkie" problem "in camera", without having to PP it at all. I think I succeeded in that. Should I have removed the mud in the bottom left corner, etc.? How about my old nemesis -- noise? C&C, please.

    Wendell

  2. #2
    BPN Member Julie Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    1,236
    Threads
    122
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Wendell,
    I like the feather detail and the reflection. I did notice the mud in the LLC but cropping it more might throw your composition off balance and put the reflection too close to the bottom of the image.
    My photoblog: juliebrown.aminus3.com

    My galleries: julielbrown.smugmug.com

    My WordPress blog: indybirdphotographer.com


    "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks”.

    John Muir

  3. #3
    Lance Peters
    Guest

    Default

    HI Wendell - I would get rid of the mud via some quick masks.
    Like the HA and the hairdo :)
    A little bright in some spots maybe and lacking in fine detail, noise looks alright just wondering if you applied it to the whole image??

  4. #4
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Wendell - HA looks good. Exposure seems close to me, but just a bit hot in a few spots. There seems to be a bit of a bluish cast in places. Personally I'd get rid of the mud. Lower capture angle would have been nice, but of course not always possible.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Costa Mesa, CA
    Posts
    1,289
    Threads
    445
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Lance:

    i thought I was beginning with a pretty good image, fairly sharp and with little noise, so I applied mild NR to the entire image -- wrong thing to do, as you have pointed out previously -- it must have messed up the sharpness as well. Please outline the steps you take to handle noise. Do you use just PS or do you have an add-on (or stand-alone) such as Noise Ninja, or whatever?

    Thanks,
    Wendell

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    1,881
    Threads
    192
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Wendell, I like the nice reflection and the angle is makes and agree that the mud is distracting.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics