Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Harlequin drake

  1. #1
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default Harlequin drake

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    D90; 80-400 VR @ 340mm. ISO 400. f/7.1 @ 1/200s. Matrix metering @ -0.7 EV. HH. 65% of original size.

    Barnegat last Friday afternoon. The filtered sun from earlier in the afternoon was disappearing behind dark cloud cover about the time I took this, thus the low SS. But maybe this helped keep the dynamic range within control. I might have wished for a few things here (slight head-turn, webbed feet showing, etc.) but I was pleased to get a harlequin image with some texture to the bird. C&C always appreciated.

  2. #2
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    Soft light can make quite a difference with this species. Exposure control and eye contact look good. I don't know your sharpening routine but it could go a bit sharper for my taste, especially in the darker parts of the plumage.

  3. #3
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Bill, Good exposure on both the light and darker plumage. I like the detail and colours, and the droplets add to the image. I agree with your self critique regarding a better HA.

  4. #4
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Axel Hildebrandt View Post
    Soft light can make quite a difference with this species. Exposure control and eye contact look good. I don't know your sharpening routine but it could go a bit sharper for my taste, especially in the darker parts of the plumage.
    Thanks Axel. I normally use Artie's recommended workflow, sharpening the jpeg after saving for web, using 3 passes of USM at 125/0.4/0, 100/0.2/0, 100/0.2/0, checking it at 100% size to make sure I'm not oversharpening. I may have been a bit timid here, because it does look a bit soft, and I always seem to lose just a bit when uploading to BPN. Thanks for looking.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    23,119
    Threads
    1,523
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    55

    Default

    Bill, I like the pose and the details look good to me. I agree a slight head turn would be nice but this is not an easy shot to get. Congrats! Nice coloring on the bird. Do wish the water was a nicer color-but...

  6. #6
    BPN Member Bill Dix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    12,487
    Threads
    1,892
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Stuart and Denise. I agree about the water color. I thought about trying to change it in PP, but decided to leave it as is. The sky had turned pretty grey by the time he perched where I wanted him (and even then, he didn't select the best rock).

  7. #7
    Justin Reznick
    Guest

    Default

    The harlequin looks fantastic Bill. In a perfect world I would like to see a a more interesting environment, perhaps lit with some golden hour light. Great capture of a gorgeous bird!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics