Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Topaz Remask Question

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boynton Beach, Florida
    Posts
    7,726
    Threads
    640
    Thank You Posts

    Default Topaz Remask Question

    anyone out there using this plug in? if so, pros and cons would be great. curious how much better it is than using quick selection tool or using a quick mask.

    thanks!

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I have used it and like it!

    For me it is easier than using selection tools in certain situations IMO. There is a thread in the ETL forum about a month ago where it is discussed in one of my threads and another member used it, I will send the link later today.

    http://www.birdphotographers.net/for...ad.php?t=50935
    Last edited by Jeff Cashdollar; 01-16-2010 at 11:42 AM.

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Vero Beach FL
    Posts
    148
    Threads
    43
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I use it all the time. It take less than a minute to do a rudimentary mask and not much longer to refine it.

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boynton Beach, Florida
    Posts
    7,726
    Threads
    640
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    thanks, guys....i got it, used it and it was pretty simple and easy. much easier and tons more efficient than a QM or using the quick selection tool!!

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Greece Athens
    Posts
    1,303
    Threads
    385
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    i use it , its pretty cool nice and easy and fast

  6. #6
    BPN Member Kerry Perkins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Simi Valley, California
    Posts
    8,310
    Threads
    1,048
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Here's another vote for ReMask2!! I've done some non-scientific comparisons using the same image with both traditional selection techniques and RM2 and it's no contest IMHO. The Topaz plug-in is just plain easier and faster. I have read some posts that expressed frustration with the clean-up process, but I have not seen this to be a problem at all, especially if you read the documentation and check out the tutorial on YouTube. ;) The first version was not as good, but the recent one is excellent.

    P.S. - if you run the plug on a layer mask instead of the image it saves a couple of steps and you can clean up really problematic areas with any of the standard selection tools.
    "It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera... they are made with the eye, heart, and head." - Henri Cartier Bresson

    Please visit me on the web at http://kerryperkinsphotography.com


  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boynton Beach, Florida
    Posts
    7,726
    Threads
    640
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    here ya go. this is with less than 24 hours with the plug in. there were two palm tree trunks growing out of his head and another cutting through the shaft of the club. i also used it for both legs and feet and the ball. i know it's not a nature pic, but it's what i have had to do for the last three weeks. catalog pics for a golf club company:eek:

    thanks for the replies. remask 2 is a definite keeper!!!!!

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,940
    Threads
    288
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    My impression is Topaz Remask is the perhaps enhanced "Background Eraser" of Photoshop. Photoshop removed it from CS4 for some reason.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics