Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Saw-whet Owl2

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Perth ON Canada
    Posts
    226
    Threads
    32
    Thank You Posts

    Default Saw-whet Owl2

    Another shot of a Saw-whet Owl from last week. Considerable pp on this image. Removed a couple of oof branches in the fg. Adjusted the strong contrast caused by the back light with S/H, B/C and dodging. As well created a vignette with dodge tool to reduce bg brightness and put focus more on owl. Some minor sharpening.

    Do you find this successful or worth while?




    Joe
    Last edited by Joe Brown; 01-13-2010 at 01:13 PM.

  2. #2
    Lance Peters
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Joe - You have cut the poor fellows tail off - I am a subscriber to "if its worth including - its worth including all of it" Looks clipped rather than a deliberate cut - which is a entirely different matter.
    Do include your full shooting info - helps everyone see whats going on.
    Looks a tad soft on my screen - also a bit of a contrast boost might help also - looks a tad flat.
    Like the pose and visible eye.

  3. #3
    Gus Cobos
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Joe,
    I agree with Mr. Peters on the tail...would suggest boosting the saturation and contrast just slightly and selective sharpen the eye...looking forward to more...:cool:

  4. #4
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Joe

    Agree on having the tail entirely !!

    The PS work was worth it and would even go a little further since you have done so much ... try getting rid of the one branch going through its head !! You have a good one !!!

  5. #5
    Anita Rakestraw
    Guest

    Default

    Joe, while I agree with the above critiques - it does have its issues - I think it's a worthwhile shot - certainly until you get a better one. That face with its large eye is precious! I don't even mind the slight softness, and didn't notice the cut off tail until I read the other comments. :D The image draws me right to the face. ;)

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Perth ON Canada
    Posts
    226
    Threads
    32
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks everyone for the excellent comments.

    Sorry about not including the shooting info. Here it is.
    5D Mark II
    300mm 2.8
    1.4TC
    1/160 sec
    f5.6
    ISO 400

    Unfortunately, I can't crop in the rest of the tail as it wasn't captured in the original shot. This is a full size portrait crop of a landscape oriented image. Actually, I didn't think of this when I was composing the shot as I was concentrating on the head.

    Regarding sharpness, being this close to the subject at f5.6 and 420mm I was working with a very thin dof. I think the beak and eye are sharp but the near side of the head is already soft. I had boosted the contrast and saturation but lowered them for the posting as I had received comments on earlier shots that I had over processed them. Same with sharpening. With the feedback I'm getting at this site I'm a little unsure how much is enough but I'm sure with time I'll get it right. :):):)

  7. #7
    Oscar Zangroniz
    Guest

    Default

    Great image. I can see why you were consentrating on the head and not paying attention to the tail.
    Congrats

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics