Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Red tail

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    White Rock, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,047
    Threads
    262
    Thank You Posts

    Default Red tail

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    This red tail was on a light standard so I decided to crop it out. Did it work?

    Camera: NIKON D90
    Lens: AF-S VR Nikkor 500mm F4G ED
    Focal length: 850*mm*(equiv. 1275*mm)
    Aperture: F9
    Exposure time: 1/200" (+1*EV)
    ISO speed rating: 400/27°
    Program: Aperture priority
    Metering Mode: Pattern
    White Balance: Auto
    Focus Mode: AF-C
    Image Stabilizer: On
    Noise Reduction: Off
    Flash: Flash did not fire

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Western Oregon, USA
    Posts
    221
    Threads
    44
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice clear profile, Roy, and good exposure. I'd leave the perch in, unless it's one of those ugly metal jobs; for me, this crop leaves a feeling of "cut off at the beltline. I think it would help if the diagonal line of the back didn't hit the left edge so close to the LL corner.While it's often good to leave some space above and forward of the head, in this case, I think a somewhat tighter crop would pull the image together better. A little turn of the head toward you would give a greater sense of presence, and would further illuminate the face and give you a stronger catch light; eye contact would make it even better. The breast feathers and face are very nice, but the nape appears a bit plated, as if it may have been a bit overworked with sharpening. You might want to go back to the original and compare. I see a thin blue halo (chromatic aberration?) along the front edge of the bird extending from the top of the head all the way to the bottom edge of the image. I often see this in images with bright BG's. You found a beautiful bird. Thanks for sharing!

    --Craig
    Last edited by Craig Markham; 01-12-2010 at 03:01 AM.

  3. #3
    Lance Peters
    Guest

    Default

    Agree with Craigs points - That little bit of head turn would have made a big difference - HAP have you in their sights Roy - LOL.

    Nice critique - Craig!!
    Looking forward to seeing more :)

  4. #4
    Gus Cobos
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Roy,
    A fine majestic bird indeed. I totally agree with Craig's fine critique. As far as the head angle and eye contact...well, lets just say that the subject was looking at something that caught his undivided attention in his natural environment...:D For now I will give you a complimentary get out of jail pass...:) Looking forward to your next one...:cool:

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Taunton MA
    Posts
    1,247
    Threads
    175
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I agree with a tighter crop or use the whole bird. Half of a bird leaves something out to my way of viewing

  6. #6
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Roy Excellent capture !! Agree with all points by Craig ... excellent !! .. wasn't sure about the halo either, thought first sharpening, could be a combination?

    Crop wise also would prefer the entire bird/perch, if need to crop might take some more out the back side, might make it more natural looking !!!

  7. #7
    Oscar Zangroniz
    Guest

    Default

    Fine looking bird with lots of details. I too think that for this one a tighter crop would look better. IMO.
    Regards

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics