From last July and a little different surroundings than usually seen here. Wind was blowing as thunderstorms were passing through this early evening. BG is pretty busy but I liked the habitat it showed, especially the cactus directly behind the owl. 40D, 400DO + 1.4xTC, f6.3, 1/160s, ISO 800, + 1/3 EC, handheld from car, cropped all around, a few spots removed from BG.
Last edited by Steve Canuel; 02-08-2010 at 12:04 AM.
Hi Steve, I like the balanced comp, and the BG doesnt distract, as it is nicely OOF. Good direct eye contact from the owl, sharp, and he pops nicely. Well captured.
Love the habitat, Steve. To my eye, it looks just a bit contrasty and maybe slightly too saturated, but I wasn't there so could be wrong with my assessment.
Very nice habitat shot. Great eye contact. I agree that the owl really pos out. I was also thinking it was a liitle contrasty. (But I can never see that in my own images??)
Peter
Lovely setting, Steve, and nice composition. I'm with Grace in that something is a bit too intense on the bird, as it looks as though it could have been digitally planted in the scene. Perhaps too much contrast on the bird, or too light, compared to the rest of the scene? Just another way of saying the bird really pops out, but perhaps too much.
Loving owls, one can just like this one too!. The overall impact is affective, as it captures and hold the interest. The tuff of grass on the left compliments the bird on the right and brings about a nice balance feeling to the image.
Hi Steve, I like the composition. The inclusion of the habitat is pleasing to me. It helps provide a sense of place and scale to the bird. I like that you kept the bird reasonably small and its place in frame. I find the it nice an sharp where it counts. Thanks for sharing.
This environmental portrait is different and I love it. The cacti are great. A version with even a bit more on the bottom might have also worked well.
BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.
BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.
Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,
Thanks for the comments everyone. Looking at it a couple of different times today, it does seem a bit too contrasty, even with my preference for contrast and colors (must've been my late night processing interpretation). One thing I think may be contributing to the "pasted in" look is the fact that he was on a little ridge and the BG cacti are actually on the opposite, rising side of a little gully. My PP plays a part as well to be sure.
HI Steve, The repost is better. But after a second look, I have a question to ask: I should have suggested that you move a half yard or so to your left; why? (There are actually three parts to the answer!)
BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.
BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.
Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,
1. To get rid of the cactus in the BG intersecting with the head,
2. to get rid of the thorny bush obscuring part of the left leg and
3. to get rid of the cactus obscuring part of the tail.
Although the light isn't too harsh wouldn't the light angle be more of a problem by moving to the left??
Last edited by Krijn Trimbos; 01-07-2010 at 08:03 AM.
Thanks Arthur. Krijn stole my answers! :D Moving left a bit looks like it would've given me a cleaner angle between the two spikey cactuses (cacti?) and put him on the cleaner BG over his left shoulder.