Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Best combo for bif

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Rigaud Mountain,Quebec
    Posts
    94
    Threads
    13
    Thank You Posts

    Default Best combo for bif

    I have the choice of a canon 50D+400.5.6L or a nickon D300+300f4and 1.4tc Whats your opinions...

  2. #2
    Oscar Zangroniz
    Guest

    Default

    Nikon D300+ 300mm F4 and 1.4tc is a great combination. Sharp and fast. Can't say anything about the Cannon cause I've never had one.

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Corning, NY
    Posts
    2,507
    Threads
    208
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Of course this may turn into a Canon vs Nikon thread. However, those who use the 50D and 400 f5.6 also swear by it. So, I would handle each body and see which fits you best. Also consider long term costs. You will most likely do other types of photography. So, look at lens availability for focal lengths you will use and the costs of the lenses. Remember, camera bodies will come and go every few years. The average serious photographer updates the body every 4 years or so. The lenses will last forever if well cared for. Your decision should be based on broader, longer term considerations.

    Either way you will be happy.

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,940
    Threads
    288
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ed Cordes View Post
    Also consider long term costs. You will most likely do other types of photography. So, look at...[snip]...the costs of the lenses. Remember, camera bodies will come and go every few years. The average serious photographer updates the body every 4 years or so. The lenses will last forever if well cared for. Your decision should be based on broader, longer term considerations.
    Meaning you should look at the costs of the camera bodies rather than those of the lenses.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Clarkston, MI
    Posts
    431
    Threads
    44
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I have not used the nikon combo but I have to imagine that the canon one would have faster AF when your comparing it to a lens with a TC, the canon 400 5.6 is one of the fastest AF lenses

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Clarkston, MI
    Posts
    431
    Threads
    44
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Desmond Chan View Post
    Meaning you should look at the costs of the camera bodies rather than those of the lenses.
    I would say the exact opposite, the costs of the lenses seems to be a much bigger difference than the camera bodies, compare nikon vs canon 500 or 600 there is 2k difference in both

    I dont see any big cost difference in the camera bodies

  7. #7
    Pedro Serralheiro
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brian simpson View Post
    I have the choice of a canon 50D+400.5.6L or a nickon D300+300f4and 1.4tc Whats your opinions...
    I'm a Nikon shooter for many years and I know well what my gear can deliver.
    But I always prefer a naked prime vs. a TC attached one, so the choice is obvious.
    Remember bodies and lenses are just tools.

  8. #8
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    For birds in flight a bare lens would be preferable since the focus locks faster. If you go the Canon route, you may also look into the 7D instead of the 50D.

  9. #9
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I would go with a 7D and the 400mm f/5.6. Aside from the relatively short focal length, it's a great lens for BIF. Very fast AF and super sharp.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  10. #10
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,940
    Threads
    288
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jamie Strickland View Post
    I would say the exact opposite

    In the long run, you may end up paying more.

  11. #11
    Flavio Rose
    Guest

  12. #12
    Bill McCrystyn
    Guest

    Default

    I would suggest, before spending this kind of money, to hold both bodies in your hand and study the big difference in features and performance. Best of luck - good hunting.

    Without getting into big money lenses like the 200-400VR and up. My money would be on a D300 70-200VR f/2.8 w/1.7 TC which would leave you fast and light AND very versitile for all kinds of shooting.

  13. #13
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Rigaud Mountain,Quebec
    Posts
    94
    Threads
    13
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Well thankyou all very much...Iwill get a 50D and the famous 400 5.6L the price for both here is 2500$ pretty cheap i think. The d300s and 7d cost almost twice the price of a 50D. And saddly nikon still has no modern 400.5.6..I heard canon has stopped making this lens?

  14. #14
    Bill McCrystyn
    Guest

    Default

    WOW - That's a quick study. :D

  15. #15
    Mike Fuhr
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill McCrystyn View Post
    I would suggest, before spending this kind of money, to hold both bodies in your hand and study the big difference in features and performance. Best of luck - good hunting.

    Without getting into big money lenses like the 200-400VR and up. My money would be on a D300 70-200VR f/2.8 w/1.7 TC which would leave you fast and light AND very versitile for all kinds of shooting.
    As a good starting point for comparison, www.megapixel.net offers the ability to compare cameras and their features side by side. I found it a helpful starting point for this type of thing.:)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics