Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Double-crested Cormorant

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    3,469
    Threads
    495
    Thank You Posts

    Default Double-crested Cormorant

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Capture made this morning at a local park pond, laying on my belly! Almost full frame, PP'ed in ACR and PS CS3, NR with Noise Ninja, selective sharpening with NIK. Cloned out a bunch of little white stuff on the water's surface. C&C welcome.

    Camera Model: NIKON D300, handheld
    Camera serial number: 3125128
    Firmware: Version 2.10
    Date/Time: 2009:12:29 10:37:25
    Shutter speed: 1/180 sec
    Aperture: 5.6
    Exposure mode: Manual
    Flash: Off
    Metering mode: Multi-segment
    ISO: 400
    Lens: VR 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D
    Focal length: 400mm
    Focal length: 600mm (in 35mm film)
    VR Image Stabilization: On
    AF mode: AF-S

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Loukie Viljoen's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Johannesburg, South Africa
    Posts
    449
    Threads
    142
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    To me it looks softish all round, Nikon does better, did the noiseninja rob you?

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auranagabad ( MS ) India
    Posts
    12,833
    Threads
    766
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Looks soft to me too
    Lovely wing pose and nice HA , you gotta love that emerald eye here
    TFS

  4. #4
    Forum Participant Joe Senzatimore's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    3,509
    Threads
    524
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Does seem a bit soft. Perhaps due to the flat light or some soft fog or mist. Has a great mono-chromatic feel. I find the lack of tack sharpness helps create the great mood this has. Can't miss that great eye!!!!

  5. #5
    Peter Farrell
    Guest

    Default

    I like it as it is. These are not glamorous birds and the slihgt softness of the image, I feel, is a plus. The overall image has a great mood. Great HA for a rear view and super detail.
    Peter

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Perth ON Canada
    Posts
    226
    Threads
    32
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great shot, the central composition really works. Looks sharp enough for me.
    Joe

  7. #7
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Other than a little softness, I like this image a lot. Great low angle, terrific pose, and a dark mood
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    3,469
    Threads
    495
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thanks all for the comments. Here is another try with a little more sharpening, don't know if it will make much difference. I always seem to get the sharpening wrong for the postings. The first post looked fine on PS to me, but maybe it lost a bit on upload.

  9. #9
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,273
    Threads
    3,977
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Terrific pose on this guy, perfect HA for this back view. Love the eye!! I detect a bit of colour noise - was the exposure needing to be raised during post-processing? Looks like there was a bit of fog, and maybe you wanted to keep that mood intact, but a bit more contrast would do good too.

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    3,469
    Threads
    495
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Cadieux View Post
    Terrific pose on this guy, perfect HA for this back view. Love the eye!! I detect a bit of colour noise - was the exposure needing to be raised during post-processing? Looks like there was a bit of fog, and maybe you wanted to keep that mood intact, but a bit more contrast would do good too.
    Yes Daniel, there was fog. My ACR sliders were adjusted as follows, exposure= 1.05, recovery= 46 and blacks= 67. The biggie was the blacks, which cut the heavy fog. Maybe this caused the color noise. I have noticed the noise at 800 iso with my D300? Maybe underexposures?

  11. #11
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,273
    Threads
    3,977
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Yes Daniel, there was fog. My ACR sliders were adjusted as follows, exposure= 1.05, recovery= 46 and blacks= 67. The biggie was the blacks, which cut the heavy fog. Maybe this caused the color noise. I have noticed the noise at 800 iso with my D300? Maybe underexposures?
    Yes, from the looks of it the colour noise was caused by recovering underexposed blacks. When applying NR there is an option to reduce colour noise (I also use Noise Ninja).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics