Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Myna fly by

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Posts
    1,353
    Threads
    90
    Thank You Posts

    Default Myna fly by



    D700
    70-200mm f2.8 VR with 1.7TC
    340mm
    ISO 400
    f8 at 1/2000s
    Manual mode
    Matrix Metering
    Dynamic, 9 points
    Auto white balance
    handheld

    Shadow/Highlight protection, crop, curve to lighten and trying to bring out details in black, lighten iris, NR and sharpen.

    Been looking for terns but they were on the wrong side of the bride with strong black light, so I decided to have fun with the gulls instead. After spend time with the gulls for a while I noticed something moving under the bridge, then suddenly this guy come up. Manage to get 3 shots, none are great but this is the third shot from the serie.

    Since the setting was set for gull with direct sunlight, but this bird was under the bridge shadow (only part of the head and tail gets sunlight) so the original image was badly underexpose. The image look soft, the focus is not really on the eye, the color a bit strange due to lighten heavy underexpose image, but I still happy since I didn't expect to catch this guy in flight, so this tell me that someday I might be able to.

    All comments and suggestions are welcome.
    Last edited by Thanaboon Jearkjirm; 12-07-2009 at 01:09 PM.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    McHenry, IL
    Posts
    228
    Threads
    48
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    It's a nice quick capture for the corrections you had to make.

    Yes, I agree it's soft, can your SW show you the focus point(s) used for capture? Also, what was the crop on this (and the distance?)

    Mark

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Image looks soft and too centered in frame IMO. The narrative seems to suggest you were not properly ready/exposed for this guy, so nice recovery given the situation. I have never seem this species. Wings in down position look good - thanks for sharing.
    Last edited by Jeff Cashdollar; 12-07-2009 at 06:56 PM.

  4. #4
    Oscar Zangroniz
    Guest

    Default

    Good HA and wing position. Just a little soft as mentioned.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bangkok, Thailand
    Posts
    1,353
    Threads
    90
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    About 33% of original. The software only show the starting focus point but not the one that was in use during the capture. Good point in bring it out, I just checked the focus point didn't show which mean it wasn't fully focus yet. Not sure about distance, it wasn't that far away but not close enough for nearly full frame at 340mm, here is the original full frame picture. Looks like I need to get my sensor clean soon.


  6. #6
    Gus Cobos
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Thanaboon,
    I like the fine details in the feathers, you have a good head angle and the wings on the down stroke is a plus. I would suggest adding a tad more canvas to the left of the frame to give your subject more room to fly into and selective sharpen the eye just a little more...good show...looking forward to more...:cool:

  7. #7
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Sure wish it was a full frame !!!

    An interesting thought is the sensor size for new cameras, with MP going on there is more ability to crop and end up with similar image quality. So far I am not keeping heavy crops but do see the logic.

    Light wise as you said nothing much you could have done, even on one of the auto modes you would have had to compensate like a demon !!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics