Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Whooper Swan

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Southwest Michigan
    Posts
    1,359
    Threads
    152
    Thank You Posts

    Default Whooper Swan Portrait

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    50D, 1/2500, iso 320 EF 100-400 shot at 100, f/9.0

    Taken at a local sanctuary.

    Thanks for looking and your comments and help are always appreciated!

    Thanks, Gary.

  2. #2
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Gary:


    Nice whooping swan portrait. I find the swan is a bit dark, and the band of BG cutting through his head a bit distracting. The light was fairly harsh as well, based on dark shadows.

    I took the liberty of bring up the swan a bit and reducing the luminosity of the background to hopefully rebalance the image a bit to better show off the bird. I wonder if the image doesn't need a bit of CW rotation as well, based on the angle of the far shore?

    Cheers

    Randy

  3. #3
    Lance Peters
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Gary - like Randys repost - a improvement for sure - still a noticeable Halo underneath the beak.
    Best to get the sun lined up at your back - to get even illumination on your subject and avoid nasty shadows.
    Might lighten the eye a tad and agree it needs some CW.
    Looking forward to more :)

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Gary,

    Light is the issue here, notice the harsh shadows, the small aperture and fast shutter retarded the light some and fill flash (ETTL) might have been helpful.

    As Lance mentioned, ensure sun is at your back. Not bad to have slight sun angle to add texture to feathers. Often you will hear photographers talk about flat light. Moreover, light coming directly over the shoulder that hits the subject directly and displays no texture. So slight angles are fine but overall, sun at your back.

  5. #5
    Gus Cobos
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Gary,
    I like the close up pose. Agree on the techs. concerning the background elements and the lighting...Randy's repost improves it quite well...looking forward to the next one...:cool:

  6. #6
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Great suggestions and fine re post by Randy !!!

    As Jeff mentioned the main problem is the light Need soft light for any white bird .... flash, besides helping out with shadows would have produced a catch light !! ... would go after them again, great subjects !!!

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boynton Beach, Florida
    Posts
    7,726
    Threads
    640
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    repost looks good, but do agree with the others reference the light. late evening, early morning the best times for these! nice compo. the distant shoreline is a little bothersome as mentioned.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics