Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Abbey Road - Revisited

  1. #1
    Bill McCrystyn
    Guest

    Default Abbey Road - Revisited

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    20D 100-400L IS @ ISO400 F/8 1/180 HANDHELD

    Strutin' his stuff on the seawall below the house about 100' away.

  2. #2
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    I like the strut Bill !!! Bg with the floating leaves is very pleasing Wish for some better light on the bird to show off his feathers

    You also avoided a merge with all leaves except the one by its foot !!! Excellent capture !!!

  3. #3
    Bill McCrystyn
    Guest

    Default Something Out Of Nothing

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Is better than nutin' at all. A strom had just passed through cluttering the lake. What would you estimate the crop factor % wise to be here.

  4. #4
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Just guessing Bill About 70% It is a sever crop

    I can appreciate the work done The blue water came out pleasing to say the least !!! This is one occasion that shooting from a higher angle is beneficial !!!

  5. #5
    Michael Pancier
    Guest

    Default

    you gave me a great idea Alfred

    you should clone him 4 times or add some other walking birds to the layer like the real album cover ....

  6. #6
    Richard Kowalski
    Guest

    Default

    Nice image Bill.

    Amazing what can be done with 8.2 megapixels!

  7. #7
    Bill McCrystyn
    Guest

    Default

    And a whole lotta PS magic. :) My problem is mostly glass. I need more range. I'm gonna get a 300 with the 2TC in a couple three months. I think that will go a long way to solving my problem. I'll be like Rosi with her new 500. As soon as the 50D 12.2 comes out though I will be on it like wolves on a kill. This is just not the kind of resolution I am used to shooting. As was noted, there is no feather detail and allot of noise was removed. You know the old axiom "the right tools for the job".

  8. #8
    Richard Kowalski
    Guest

    Default

    Well if you are serious about resolution, then you should consider going to a 1Ds MkIII. 21 megapixels.
    Then again a medium format body with a digital back perhaps?

    Dream big, aim high!

    The 1Ds MkIII is my personal goal, but it may be a few years before that happens. Until then, my 20D, 10D & EOS-3 will have to do.

  9. #9
    Bill McCrystyn
    Guest

    Default

    One step at a time. Thanks Richard.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics