Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Eagle roost

  1. #1
    Ben Egbert
    Guest

    Default Eagle roost

    I have been rebuilding my SmugMug gallery and reprocessing my images from scratch using some of the things I have learned here. This was taken at Lake Coeur d’Alene in Jan. 2007 with my 5D, 500f4 and 1.4X ISO200 and 1/200 sec from a Wimberly Sidekick.

    I was fairly close so this is not a large crop. It was shot horizontal and cropped vertically. There was a main trunk extending in front of the bird. I cropped it back to the intersection with the branch and tried to give it a natural looking termination. I also considered cropping about ½ inch into the image to eliminate the juncture. I would like opinions. I want to show this at club. It prints nicely to 16x20.

    I believe the main flaw in this image is that the light direction is not directly behind my back. But this is about as good as it gets at this roosting tree.


  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Sharpness is excellent Ben. Even though your subject is side/backlit, there is reasonable detail in the darks. I find the perch a little too bright and would tone it down a bit. I also would like the bird a little higher in the frame.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  3. #3
    Ben Egbert
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug Brown View Post
    Sharpness is excellent Ben. Even though your subject is side/backlit, there is reasonable detail in the darks. I find the perch a little too bright and would tone it down a bit. I also would like the bird a little higher in the frame.
    Thanks Doug, good suggestions, how about I crop off some top? Or do I need more at the bottom? Rats, that would be a total remake. But what the heck, well worth it.

  4. #4
    Judy Lynn Malloch
    Guest

    Default

    As Doug mentioned beautiful detail even though there is side lighting. Love the pose and good eye contact. I like it as posted but cropping a tad from the top would bring the subject into view even more. Lovely capture Ben.

  5. #5
    Ben Egbert
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Judy Lynn Malloch View Post
    As Doug mentioned beautiful detail even though there is side lighting. Love the pose and good eye contact. I like it as posted but cropping a tad from the top would bring the subject into view even more. Lovely capture Ben.
    Thanks for your coments. I am thinking I would like to go to a 4/5 aspect ratio, so maybe a tighter crop that takes a bit off the top and right side and eliminate that juncture of the limb. I still get more right and top space than bottom left.

    Cropping is still coming hard to me.
    Last edited by Ben Egbert; 11-10-2009 at 02:00 PM.

  6. #6
    Forum Participant Manos Papadomanolakis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Crete Greece
    Posts
    3,408
    Threads
    179
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    beautiful pose,light!

  7. #7
    Ben Egbert
    Guest

    Default

    Here is the crop I propose, is it too tight? I also darkened the perch.


  8. #8
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    The repost looks better, maybe just a bit tight. I like the sharpness and eye contact. Adjusting curves can help out quite well to even out the highlights and shadows. I think you already did a good job with the exposure control.

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auranagabad ( MS ) India
    Posts
    12,833
    Threads
    766
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    beautiful pose and sharpness here , repost looks better to me
    TFS

  10. #10
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I too prefer the repost. My big problem is with the light angle. You state that this light angle is "as good as it gets" at this location. Why?
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  11. #11
    Ben Egbert
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks Axel and Harshad and Mano for your comments.

  12. #12
    Ben Egbert
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur Morris View Post
    I too prefer the repost. My big problem is with the light angle. You state that this light angle is "as good as it gets" at this location. Why?
    Well the lake is surrounded by mountains for one thing, so we don't get any light here until 10:30 or so in Dec, Jan. This tree is on the side of a bank that slopes south into the lake and that is too steep to move further south. Fact is, I have been shooting this tree since the early 80's. It is reliable for eagles, but not for light. Even If I could get down the bank, I would have a very steep shooting angle as I would be at least 30 feet lower. There are also trees in the way.

    This could be a good late afternoon location, but then there is lots of background clutter. (Edit), actually this is the reverse problem I would be shooting southeast with a sun from the south west.

    The eagles are usually either on the north or east side of the lake. In winter, the sun is almost always in the south. Sometimes the best light is when it is slightly overcast (I showed one of these a few weeks back). I can go to the east side and have the sun at my back and the lake in front, and I do this for feeding shots. But this does not work for roost shots. Also, the sun on the east side is after 11:00 or so and fairly harsh by then.

    The salmon spawn has been failing the last two years. We used to get 150 or more eagles from Mid Dec until Feb, but as the spawn dies, the number of eagles drop as well.

    For anyone local, this is Higgens Point, about 100 yard east of his statue.
    Last edited by Ben Egbert; 11-10-2009 at 09:30 PM.

  13. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Bangalore, Karnataka
    Posts
    3,800
    Threads
    236
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Loved the details and pose, repost looks good, congrats..

  14. #14
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The light has brought out excellent feather detail, and nice and sharp too. Good eye contact, agree this is a bit tight at the bottom and left.

  15. #15
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Egbert View Post
    Well the lake is surrounded by mountains for one thing, so we don't get any light here until 10:30 or so in Dec, Jan. This tree is on the side of a bank that slopes south into the lake and that is too steep to move further south. Fact is, I have been shooting this tree since the early 80's. It is reliable for eagles, but not for light. Even If I could get down the bank, I would have a very steep shooting angle as I would be at least 30 feet lower. There are also trees in the way.

    This could be a good late afternoon location, but then there is lots of background clutter. (Edit), actually this is the reverse problem I would be shooting southeast with a sun from the south west.

    The eagles are usually either on the north or east side of the lake. In winter, the sun is almost always in the south. Sometimes the best light is when it is slightly overcast (I showed one of these a few weeks back). I can go to the east side and have the sun at my back and the lake in front, and I do this for feeding shots. But this does not work for roost shots. Also, the sun on the east side is after 11:00 or so and fairly harsh by then.

    The salmon spawn has been failing the last two years. We used to get 150 or more eagles from Mid Dec until Feb, but as the spawn dies, the number of eagles drop as well.

    For anyone local, this is Higgens Point, about 100 yard east of his statue.
    Thanks for the info. You can do some great stuff on cloudy days with eagles.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  16. #16
    Ben Egbert
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur Morris View Post
    Thanks for the info. You can do some great stuff on cloudy days with eagles.
    Thanks Artie, I will be over there in about 2-3 weeks for this seasons eagles. Each year is a bit different and sometimes we get surprises. This may be my last year for decent hand held flight stuff, planning to use my 50D and 500f4 without extender.

    Question for you. I choose this eagle because it is super sharp and a light crop on a FF 12mpix camera. It will print large and probably do well at club where the judges are far less exacting. But I have others I could show with better light albiet more crop. Do you think the front shadow on this is bad enough that it should not be shown?

    I am not in this competion stuff for prizes, but mostly to get critique and improvement.

  17. #17
    Ben Egbert
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks Kiran and Stuart. I will consider a recrop. I have material to work with, but not on the cloned out version so it means starting from scratch. Not a particually hard job, and this was a fairly easy to process image.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics