Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Cedar Waxwing

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    480
    Threads
    54
    Thank You Posts

    Default Cedar Waxwing

    Juvenile bird. This was in a shady area so I had to crank up the ISO a bit for sharpness and in hopes of catching action.

    RAW processed in DPP, then brought into Photoshop. Had to do noise reduction on the bird, the noise was worse than expected. Starting to think my 40D would have handled it better...



    Canon 100-400mm, handheld in natural light, overcast weather, IS mode 1 as usual, shot in Aperture Priority

    Camera: Canon EOS 7D
    Exposure: 0.001 sec (1/800)
    Aperture: f/5.6
    Focal Length: 400 mm
    ISO Speed: 1000
    Exposure Bias: +4/3 EV
    Flash: Off, Did not fire
    Last edited by Dave Blinder; 11-03-2009 at 07:03 PM. Reason: lens info added

  2. #2
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,545
    Threads
    1,318
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice behavioral shot, the problem here is lack of detail/blurry head.
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    480
    Threads
    54
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Arash, I think you're right on both cases. The poor lighting didn't help with detail, nor did noise reduction. I was surprised to find motion blur at 1/800s too. I have a couple of other frames left to process, but the action and HA weren't as good.

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Costa Rica
    Posts
    4,547
    Threads
    253
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very nice bird and the action of it eating is a big plus. I am not crazy about the light BG.
    It seems blurred and to me, it needs a bit of contrast.

  5. #5
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dave, good feeding behaviour captured. I feel moving around if it was possible, to not have had the light area behind the subject.

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,940
    Threads
    288
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I think the bird could use some sharpening. Personally, I would try to deal with the leave in the background that appears to be touching the back of the waxwing and, if possible, get rid of the blurred tree/branch in the background on the left of the pic, too. I like the light and the exposure though. Good colors also.

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    480
    Threads
    54
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks everyone comments noted. Unfortunately this image can't endure anymore contrast adjustments or sharpening, noise is already too high. I don't like to clone on the edges of feathers, the destructive effects are tough to repair in a realistic manner.

    A near miss of a great shot!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics