Originally Posted by
paul leverington
Mike I'm startin to look forward to your comments for the detail that you pick up on. I pondered both those nits actually. The snowflake was there--and well I figured this adds to the realism that he's in a snow fall. There should be some flakes in front of him right? -and -so there were. But it could go with out much fuss about it I suppose. The darker eye was actually darker cause there was a bit of directional light from the left(ours) and that is the reality of that one. However--who but a purest would know or think of this. Me maybe--but most I think would look at it and and prefer seeing both eyes clearly. Something for me to consider. I gotta tell you when I first started digital I did more to the image than I would ever do now--generally speaking. I think I like to leave things as much as possible as shot--but if it really makes a big power difference and the shot is worth it I may go that way. I made those changes you suggested to Landing on a dream--yes-- I like the shot better now. Thanks bro.
About your first statement Mike. I can't say it enough. Composition is the language of the subconscious. It doesn't hurt to have a great subject to work with either, but a great comp bypasses the cognitive and speaks to ones gut. I hope that I don't sound like I'm pontificating, but the stuff works--and works repeatedly. And reliably. Photograph compositions, not birds in a way of saying it.
Paul